From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2HMD-0005pZ-SN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:39:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60809E07AF; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35001E07AF for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so3120970pwj.26 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:38:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=dVDf4NHvhq/jYl/VkEoOGkUfKVFrQ3cKQsQKAU7/jI8=; b=WiId3tpb1938E1l04BRYSmOGRuS9jylD5frghAuu5jMJmswVrv7CseHcmxJi8O8VI5 NkPLBpy3cd2kKoC6pdFYD5C2Dy4x/B5QPf7Vs1kDGZwnFgCLrHQT6GS4+2nbRYPO7VLv +ErISjDilspXvhGKvtd5gF4bnjoCE1ZtKLqdI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bUDVpy0OVq+DMODosTt5tkMDlKw7McUA4mRKQZ1XF5ApKCdsQrBm26woss8CD3HWKB e19sGZ9zig40idSEDpNvo/S4AoYT9bgUZ33aiaUxsHcRm0hRhZRT/SZ3GxK+D+TvaOU1 lxVtxqGFFRrImE5MnMJ/9ziEVLAvPG9J8j4fY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.21.38 with SMTP id y38mr1095517wfi.206.1256531938802; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:38:58 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] strange dmesg output From: Maxim Wexler To: gentoo-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 6dc95a3f-57f8-4993-be46-4ced91369624 X-Archives-Hash: 83a3cdb5862196f648b57cc5b7442aa7 Hi group, Still sorting out the glitches in the new 2.6.30-r7 kernel. eg the strange output of dmesg: ... age: 1e 00 00 00 01 00 usb-storage: Bulk Command S 0x43425355 T 0x8 L 0 F 0 Trg 0 LUN 0 CL 6 usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31 usb-storage: -- transfer complete usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0 usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW... usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13 usb-storage: -- transfer complete usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0 usb-storage: Bulk Status S 0x53425355 T 0x8 R 0 Stat 0x1 usb-storage: -- transport indicates command failure usb-storage: Issuing auto-REQUEST_SENSE usb-storage: Bulk Command S 0x43425355 T 0x9 L 18 F 128 Trg 0 LUN 0 CL 6 usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31 usb-storage: -- transfer complete usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0 usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist: xfer 18 bytes, 1 entries usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 18/18 usb-storage: -- transfer complete usb-storage: Bulk data transfer result 0x0 usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW... ... and so on, for 2739 lines. Nothing about other drives, file sytems, hardware, busses etc. When I plug in a usb key, for instance, dmesg doesn't even notice although the log console(F12) makes a note of the device. The earlier kernel acts "normally". Did I leave something out of the kernel? I can't think what. Maxim