From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-97007-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1MI6A0-0006GA-2Z
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:23:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF4EDE005A;
	Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f207.google.com (mail-gx0-f207.google.com [209.85.217.207])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4511E005A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so9835574gxk.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Yf9vlxGunvOKcNXHAkw2wLM4lMkV/w16J5jXNyKkTUc=;
        b=QZbelwye7hfzdz2u4xQ1ReBvVoPbq+X1mcxwYt7/JNtnv9ZCDLwIC0h02xCbhrLHyN
         t+1CRKz0lUg/c3yxirELgzHUjulV0vSelNnLvgeLdiZa7DRWu2U7H6t6Tfy2yQXow4NB
         jB+xaRnal/Aa1+JQZ/u3AZ/2Ycg8Br/HJo1uA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vp1FfjdDr3gR5J+YEtuczrQAr4wCigGGLQWyN/IEwYzxi7tLwhU57EHamdlJtGwGmP
         ZZXyH41jZpEadwU5SlgXC1mU4Zn4Oy5sgqCUgfo6tLcN25Q223Vp7xmkvygpvfBVzz0k
         S4U4BP1ZNgm4Sp/95/tZ1e/M7yFqhE1Ttd1kc=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.11.141 with SMTP id t13mr1353680ibt.28.1245525810301; Sat, 
	20 Jun 2009 12:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200906200908.10610.dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
References: <a0811460906192115k1de5cc9dk3e1707fc90de554f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090620113338.7d78293c@coercion>
	 <200906200908.10610.dirk.heinrichs@online.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:23:29 -0600
Message-ID: <a0811460906201223x4df1be74q50600318cec2bdef@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lvm problem -- is timing?
From: Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 60f2e9ef-2a49-40d2-8bdb-e9812b657af2
X-Archives-Hash: 7ccf63edac8f39384ee2fa1d0b6ea027

> As said above, it's not not needed. Maybe it's better to investigate wether
> there are any leftovers from baselayout 1 in the runlevels. This was at

How?

> least
> the reason I got an unbootable system after switching to bl 2.
>

I upgraded to bl-2 to avoid this problem but it didn't help. The
system "boots" but is crippled until the vgs are mounted by hand.

mw