From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGMc9-0000EP-3K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:33:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E9DBE0381; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f207.google.com (mail-gx0-f207.google.com [209.85.217.207]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421CCE0381 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so19220332gxk.10 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mjJPD9fyY24hS66c01NyPxVXMRv+S374GjYIIuJsCYY=; b=MFyxnI/cSMGciM6SkdhdnDYuqRXpGbs4LdMoa8dbHuuLG0k9TkxLMVc0bui3XxKN9V dA43X2fXYy7d06aiMqLw1wBj82E6+298jQWVFkox72hlZqM0ylmVRFyvl6tBc6/u4DV2 vglMgqWdSCca7TWUteuaUMQvbtNzovB3Cc3b0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V1zQkZ8TYUY7lQrDT1dF+ETZ6N0w052DcZoHkvleG2vCYx1JDLbtIJw8/x1nSY5NOj sQiqiS41MKQFbFQL81UdJP2P+I9Mx5sP8WTf9Sdw4F3I6mP5i0GeKfGOfHF+GhMeM1AY Cu6Hn4i3G/pJtD/3DEF+wXBxEvOSIv0WicbFQ= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.18.197 with SMTP id x5mr2726917iba.0.1245112402861; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:33:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200906151906.01800.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <20090615084551.4b1f9768@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <200906151906.01800.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:33:22 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lvm problem(s) From: Maxim Wexler To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6d7ee52a-f4f7-48c0-b7c7-b800f2e68648 X-Archives-Hash: d6f9c84473adb88e8f0a32247b99599f > > With baselayout2 and openrc, you need to explicitly put lvm into the boot Wow! I didn't even realize lvm was in init.d. There's nothing in the doc about it. So I went ahead and added to the boot-level and rebooted. Same as before with (looks like) one addition: ... *The lvm init-script is written for baselayout-2! [!!] *Please do not use it with baselayout-1! So I removed lvm from boot level and just did a static /etc/init.d/lvm start and got the exact msg as above. ... How did I only get baselayout-1? I used the latest tarballs. And what init-script should I use? FWIW only one device, the SD card, can't be found and it is listed about 20 times in the boot console before the LVM gives up. Hold on, here's /etc/conf.d/lvm: #LVM should normally only be started after mdraid is available #this is because LVM physical volumes are very often MD devices RC_AFTER="mdraid" #vim: ft=gentoo-conf-d Well, I don't have mdraid, as far as I know. I'll just comment out that line and see where it leads. mw