From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-96679-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MFEgD-0005cH-2H
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:52:57 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD650E0411;
Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:52:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B825EE0411
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:52:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so4811045and.1
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Uji9YgmrvCPKIpvBF+CuuzJ3f0LQ7zKV1yHabN0FlkI=;
b=ahtADCHL1qNmDjFyOMmFYU/qKUp02Ted4IOB6lugzM4Ts9fdvKKksNtbBzZDtaWPAf
wZhugjKyeLxDK7GYK37gZWROAHTT+eSc8vBAo4/oAdyRx7x7VJNQ9kx21IAaCr8BrqIB
McUeBRymo+oJFlI41b5fPMS/5RMJ11LTGlSAM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=L9JpdYfESHs0pBhu5OTgn8gwvQw8INHBWjgD7u+roIlaT28FWhajArWTlLFOJ2PHG/
S/XQ5E8gijuMN36WYLwku7SQQtQ/fu/Nbz0r/VSWx5peLvF7KXN+QeyRAGm7tI2mTfcy
QRvjABxEC2m8W8j90I2MPTrSRbJkcu2Agm8h4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.17.199 with SMTP id t7mr1756549iba.46.1244843574289; Fri,
12 Jun 2009 14:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090613023059.432ee32a@coercion>
References: <a0811460906121245l6ff2a399wdaf7c9e5b583efe2@mail.gmail.com>
<20090613023059.432ee32a@coercion>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:52:54 -0600
Message-ID: <a0811460906121452r4756d758mb0143e92fe18f8be@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] conflict in fstab w/ lvm?
From: Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: bc714be2-a1d4-418b-b4eb-d81df7cc86c8
X-Archives-Hash: b6a2e20f7030922f3d8fef3bd8c90c85
On 6/12/09, Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:45:04 -0600
> Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> #shm /dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0
>
> I wonder, what's the rationale behind commenting out shm?
>
Good question. I was given to understand the new line was intended to
replaced the default, which I commented out. Perhaps that's a mistake.
That's how I configured the previous iteration of genteee before it
went south; maybe the new line had something to do with it. Should I
use both?
mw