From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10FB158086 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 05:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5942EE08EB; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 05:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (mail-1.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B3FE08BF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 05:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mp-mx11.ca.inter.net (mp-mx11.ca.inter.net [208.85.217.19]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C172EA02D for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:12:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by mp-mx11.ca.inter.net (mp-mx11.ca.inter.net [208.85.217.19]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1JbkjIoGwA4C for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:12:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (host-45-58-231-132.dyn.295.ca [45.58.231.132]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 18C512EA13F for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:12:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:12:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:12:02 -0500 From: Philip Webb To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any decent alternative to Thunderbird? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <2e771f3e-e84f-5f42-c9e8-ce1692cc848d@youngman.org.uk> <5790545.lOV4Wx5bFT@invader> <3b9413eb-b354-6221-25c9-513445188097@youngman.org.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3b9413eb-b354-6221-25c9-513445188097@youngman.org.uk> X-Archives-Salt: 30becfe8-a8ca-4103-b23e-6fcf9c20609c X-Archives-Hash: 43d1667140d3c5dbe4aef188adaea083 211114 Wol asked for alternative mail clients : Don't overlook Mutt : simple, easy to configure, powerful. > On 14/11/2021 22:39, Marco Rebhan wrote: >> If you do decide to try out KMail you might want them anyway though, >> they have fixed crashes for me there. > Does kmail run on Windows? Mutt should run on Losedows : I certainly haven't tried. > Although I run KDE, I tend to avoid kde apps like the plague : > after my experience with KDE4 so would you You are very much behind the times ! KDE 5 has long been mature : give it a try. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca