From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B8A1382C5 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2926FE0870; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591E0E0864 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:34:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1622975648; bh=NxIs3csG35F/PjWt0TK7/h1fBEYchQ5ayjTfBtHfZGE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ExT2+oDk2olfs3jC0Vk8PAMmUb1E7oSZ4i3djT/muMG/Ao6QSniMwIdLZOSC55uM+ wO3C6anupMjxQqmPViOGZzKhan8vXL9tjgFJbLSG8FE2lviDKAsP/TESeTGLZU8bM8 c1gtIVNFTJecnjPVwyBJS66zxvSodZyHomQN+x/k= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from tp ([92.117.42.38]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtfJX-1lVhj50lXL-00v9kR for ; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 12:34:08 +0200 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:34:06 +0200 From: Frank Steinmetzger To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Would constant max CPU speed cause lockups? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bhRKFPqGcxpik4A8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt 2.0.7; VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:+sAvPerAMtfZqQ4Vm6D0WSCG3sMCTUy/6glxLHUOVdw+3QUZnbK J60tvb73ac0XY32fw4dU8gYfXaYkca1Xea4YfSAjZrN1C2jfkrsHSiLIG6wuIZE0DMM5PXQ HEUhLXuDB+Of2k1SWNaXOfgrICYf4IN9cR4k8ytKXeRpURnI62HTbAil9BPLPXrHPD7UdkO RU5keeHvorFz6DmZi2+0w== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:FqdUmSF8F7g=:H5w81EoeSOCetDjKaptR1K KuzaaCumh1ny+yMbQ+u/l0H8WqM+A3U4WUv0C6toW572eR1LAtvjuXvQpdMTMeBFA86p6vr/j 5BUTL/c7nhuRemqAFxFCbzUq8qJObMUNPQSElYBe3idiWCt6VRcenmXKSPKib6vRdmwOCfkQi g9vPC7aRt88fu5C+VLjIhiCBlNenAZatUXd0TU/0i+C2nUZoACKTKYWlHYfxoeT2t24XQ986+ IBWLjXr4Yh+RJMp8gYT8BCYGlAq7ZG3VXfD6mpypUntTotDmlYXhd8z7bvJgQQ8oZuzFROIPF VVJ7N1Ph3RwHyUK9MPqo3uApTdHo+4egI2o8/Ed6EPey5qSiDXWeyi/Ux34BQ0lUgeIe+h076 bOdsUjxOEadC3m3xZLqVI6OwGYKGjcLJSODcbnomWVmkfHcOGD5ADvXDElR1Mj0vo2DunQv28 1+w5xDWC3NC5R/gN2NufBJgkN3zMf9PDzb2dFa4oFlIqr6z4Sq6/PBwWzDuoixxZBWevCma5z HQRtpr2x7prL7km2Hy2Vgkc+5jsS4RLNhkCehZEDHhwZhSj1irG9HVJWLJl7x8aSR8gmLyG1V oSplM4XgDUrX1nhdRvuCuRtugiapt76IcHESoHlj/PopzXaNHtJokMrbPAyoS+mV/i9xxWTeL cM67sdMKUQLXBgLGQ31VRocCSYvoaN5PJYSlZz1wHIRkvBmLri4xTboH+N2t2gV5ctwVgdA/o P2G7wTRMETiqmefaivEgc39csYyOKiS8OGHl393jim6E1NODSkiCXB/dNQgvr5rsWxu0hicwt 7j7Jw9jtUP3xNiiHCfgISCTr/8DegTn4MX392ZBQLutSV9WlQixfj/MRqCItwG4K7v5x7mAjg 5GKTTaRPz5tosKqdBZeeiH4CJaPJCC7h4QoNRUVF6k/xTD+pn8LMa6ftsyAX5HH3Om69C/pC/ cBusZKfMPQTXIdcnnW76j5bryINO8DgDq/gY6vW8zsh0vlGN4FoC3SRBCi1CM82vo/QMimjlm icbAbUJ8GLewe/WcIPeZ/uQNglEcIAbFABBonQnTGcLii1K/N/b0J1lxjHGOw93qOlTk74pVf 7HaBtkQlTJZTZR8FbA4ZRlayfN7uTzdtlpT X-Archives-Salt: ac8537ba-1253-46fb-84be-f9ecdf3a08ab X-Archives-Hash: cce2ba99e131fb36dbb7e67fd8f0505e --bhRKFPqGcxpik4A8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 01:18:15PM -0400 schrieb Walter Dnes: > A few years ago, I cheaped out and bought a low-powered Atom desktop > with 8 gigs of RAM. Looking back, that was a mistake. It would default > to 480p or at best 720p on Youtube. But I wrote a nifty bash script > that manually put the CPU into "userspace" mode, and selected the > maximum available CPU speed. I finally got Youtube with steady playback > at 1080p... YAY! OT, but an input to this aspect: in-browser playback has always been a lackluster for me. It gobbles up CPU cycles and makes the fans spin. Therefore by now it=E2=80=99s been engraved= into my muscle memory to copy the URL, download it and play it with $FAVORITE_VIDEO_PLAYER. I had a go at my Eeepc Atom netbook a few months back to see whether I could use it as a little home server for Nextcloud and the likes. I noticed that it drew 14 W from the socket at idle. And its performance was actually much worse than my raspi=E2=80=99s (which suckles maybe 4 W). So I stowed it for= good. Pity, the haptic was not bad, but that=E2=80=99s the circle of life. --=20 Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe | Greetings | Qapla=E2=80=99 Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. If your laundry just wouldn=E2=80=99t become white, may be that=E2=80=99s because it is coloured. --bhRKFPqGcxpik4A8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEVbE9o2D2lE5fhoVsizG+tUDUMMoFAmC8pJ4ACgkQizG+tUDU MMrQuA//VJsa8GNgd7KyfGq/QC2YlqzYVCdxQi011bFcHPHXba0rzImWSwHqnoYO c4caA1IU2tjOrIxWPYIAQSmMavvxtJzMVZIDUqIP/fAOHVSl03agOU5p7UaHj65H rTNs33/jbtIUuzg5rlN4cNz9gZnCIsZbmpn/YQBu/MVa40ZYO+7QrNueJDGw7Oj0 rYRW7s1z83obP/BhnTs78kAKfuMI2imhbjLEfFk1YY4g86o0yaKUUl6k36QQJmO1 q6Nx3HyvqI+X1TcOviBGe3Nej/raqzKLoptfN+EX0ukkZD7qb1VEVYB3DsobmBEN UmaBJs/ULkVcfbHAm4CHhSrCETmslmRBHfTr66HpI7RSHH8vjoT8FvuCmHDEu2Ch Nl2TOoT5lQn4LZ1DKXmPQfACq4bQoH5YpgeaxwdgRybzEtH1e62pbYPFvRPTcxPE s9MJ97vx1X2y+4KZMVPtOEDN59iqcAj9jseb0VcC4f5EItZzQkSpWBX+wA5dQytw Tfy1SoFzjE1cyrhEDRz5g8XisEd8L6n/kmaeTOTq3WGqHHQh9oUSfdi8mLqYWxBO G0KnxPeuaTH2J+NPCK2liRZF49m+Oa+Vg7C6+1aUJPQyHPD7fZEugqCzjEYlwrAe uSsmCbMIuB6vD0heFVdCUFNhmgRAxK1BSL7Bni66FIPFe9u9opc= =hqbl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bhRKFPqGcxpik4A8--