From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA2B1382C5 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B04E6E086C; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pmta11.teksavvy.com (pmta11.teksavvy.com [76.10.157.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B63EE085A for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:54:17 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: S+47qYQP2YJ5NnqHpFXOYqBR9K5ZvBShikO8+or09hAHrUJRX734pp3VyclVV6gS+fkMQOFhDC LAclQd3gh2Tw== X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2ElEgDwSR5g/1Z9oWxGHB0BAQEBCQE?= =?us-ascii?q?SAQUFAUAHgUiDIVZriHWEUIZAAYF5HQM3AYM7mFILAQEBAQEBAQEBLAkBAgQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQOEQgQCAoICJjgTAgMBAQsBAQEFAQEBAQEGBAIChk4Ng1WBBwEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEWAg1UaAEBAQECATocKAsLGBwSEEcZCYMegmYgD0CtNHS?= =?us-ascii?q?BNIVZhQSBOI1DQT+BAj+EKj6CXQQXghOFLASCToEPDBcBImNYaC+QBI0im2s?= =?us-ascii?q?KgnqBGQaIF5Jvkz2PZZ9dlmeBeoF7fQiDJAlHGQ1Xlk+FYyYwAjUCBgoBAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?JVwGLQAEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2ElEgDwSR5g/1Z9oWxGHB0BAQEBCQESAQUFAUAHgUiDI?= =?us-ascii?q?VZriHWEUIZAAYF5HQM3AYM7mFILAQEBAQEBAQEBLAkBAgQBAQOEQgQCAoICJ?= =?us-ascii?q?jgTAgMBAQsBAQEFAQEBAQEGBAIChk4Ng1WBBwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEWAg1UaAEBAQECATocKAsLGBwSEEcZCYMegmYgD0CtNHSBNIVZhQSBOI1DQ?= =?us-ascii?q?T+BAj+EKj6CXQQXghOFLASCToEPDBcBImNYaC+QBI0im2sKgnqBGQaIF5Jvk?= =?us-ascii?q?z2PZZ9dlmeBeoF7fQiDJAlHGQ1Xlk+FYyYwAjUCBgoBAQMJVwGLQAEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,157,1610427600"; d="scan'208";a="156704328" Received: from 108-161-125-86.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([108.161.125.86]) by smtp11.teksavvy.com with SMTP; 06 Feb 2021 02:54:15 -0500 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Feb 2021 02:54:14 -0500 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 02:54:14 -0500 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] HOWTO: Freezing/unfreezing (groups of) processes Message-ID: References: <6ddfd5556b9f5ad8dbaf02a07c6c54714d100cfc.camel@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6ddfd5556b9f5ad8dbaf02a07c6c54714d100cfc.camel@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: bd95b60c-fd81-4af8-891f-a25baec334c9 X-Archives-Hash: c92737c6b1d71fe9f2307dbc3f2a4cf2 On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:42:26PM -0600, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote > On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 13:24 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > > I'll have to take that back. It happened again, and I was not > > fiddling with pstop/pcont. The common element seems to be that I was > > compiling Pale Moon 29.0 each time it crashed. A machine with 8 gigs of > > ram, and 598 of 905 gigs free diskspace should not have resource issues. > > I contest this claim. 8GB is pretty scant for something as large and > complex as a modern browser. Have you built this before on the same > machine? See http://www.palemoon.org/releasenotes.shtml My previous successful build was 28.17.0 which was released December 18th. Note: Chrome and Firefox seem to bump the major release number "just because". The Pale Moon devs use all 3 digits. E.g. an isolated bugfix has just been released as 29.0.1. When the major release number on Pale Moon is incremented, there are big changes "under the hood", so increased requirements are a possibility going from version 28.17 to 29.0. There's also ongoing work on "de-unifying the sources" https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=24296 The thread starts off with the question "Is it expected that Pale Moon compilation time has almost doubled after de-unifying the sources?". To which the head honcho replies... > That was only de-unifying /dom -- more will follow. > > And yes, if your aren't on a particularly powerful machine with > a fast drive, it can impact your compilation time significantly. I have a relatively new 16-gig machine (October) that I'll try it on. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications