From: Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Performance: WD vs. Samung SSD vs. M.2 SSD
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 19:33:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X8fd7h+hNXaHP0iH@kern> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9aebffcb-2f01-96bd-ae52-2d0e5cef66ac@sys-concept.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1163 bytes --]
Am Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 02:46:56PM -0700 schrieb thelma@sys-concept.com:
> Nothing scientific, but I was surprised how fast M.2 disk so decided to
> time how fast GnuCash will load my accounting, her it is:
>
> Box 1.)
> WD (spinning disk) CPU AMD-8150 (8-core), 16GiB
> Time to open GnuCash - 23sec.
>
> Box 2.)
> Samsung SSD 850, CPU AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Quad-Core, 16GiB
> Time to open GnuCash - 15sec.
I can hardly believe that. Does your duration include the entire boot
process? If so, the times look quite alright, but that’s not what
description says.
Can you reproduce the same time when you close and then open gnucash a
second time? (By then all files should be in cache and startup should be
significantly faster if indeed the drive is responsible).
> Box 3.)
> M.2 SSD, CPU AMD Ryzen 7, 32Gib
> Time to open GnuCash - 2.5sec
If you indeed do include boot times, then I find this too fast. But if it
does, then not bad. *whistle*
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network.
Just because I wrote a word wrong doesn’t mean that I am imcomentent.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 21:46 [gentoo-user] Performance: WD vs. Samung SSD vs. M.2 SSD thelma
2020-12-01 21:57 ` thelma
2020-12-02 3:41 ` bobwxc
2020-12-02 3:58 ` thelma
2020-12-02 18:33 ` Frank Steinmetzger [this message]
2020-12-02 19:45 ` Rich Freeman
2020-12-02 21:03 ` thelma
2020-12-02 23:14 ` Peter Humphrey
2020-12-02 23:49 ` thelma
2020-12-03 0:09 ` Peter Humphrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X8fd7h+hNXaHP0iH@kern \
--to=warp_7@gmx.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox