From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G82Hu-0006nw-Pw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:00:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k71LvEWl030810; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:57:14 GMT Received: from megahappy.net (82-182-31-216.tierzero.net [216.31.182.82] (may be forged)) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k71Lro4M028366 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:53:50 GMT Received: by megahappy.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91CD64C00D; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by megahappy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E15668006 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Bryan Whitehead To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail In-Reply-To: <44CE4ABA.6040200@mid.email-server.info> Message-ID: References: <217e6afb0607302300j313a56fh66a9e7f1815a91e4@mail.gmail.com> <44CDF760.9060507@mid.message-center.info> <558b73fb0607310608j6482bbfbre28adef65f32099b@mail.gmail.com> <44CE11E6.3050406@mid.message-center.info> <558b73fb0607310852x2d6cb55cw91568899dc00a6da@mail.gmail.com> <44CE4ABA.6040200@mid.email-server.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 65aed4bd-bc65-42c7-922c-061c1bd259a2 X-Archives-Hash: f2aa536c50b70d430b47e7d14dfb862a > Anyway - I stand to what I wrote. I'd suggest any MTA, *BESIDES* > qmail and sendmail. qmail, as it's too buggy, too few features > and too "complicated". sendmail, as the configuration is a nightmare > (compared to easier systems available nowadays). I object to this statement. Sendmail is a solid MTA. Calling it as bad as qmail is just going to far... I've maintained some pretty large sendmail systems without a problem. That said - I now use postfix if given a choice. -- Bryan Whitehead Email:driver@megahappy.net -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list