From: Steven Susbauer <stupendoussteve@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo Mailing List <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Module philosophy: Compile-in or Load
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:44:21 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606112243250.872@ladonis.lannet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448CFAAA.7030102@gt.rr.com>
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I was wondering what gentoo-users think and practice about kernel
> modules. Do most compile them in the kernel or load them at boot-up.
>
> Note that I'm _NOT_ talking about those modules that have to be compiled
> in such as for your filesystem. This is about the other ones.
>
> I generally like to load them at boot-up. One reason is that I have
> heard that for suspend or hibernate to work, some modules have to be
> unloaded.
>
> On the other hand, compiling them in results in faster boot times.
>
> So, what do gentoo-users think?
>
> Tony
>
I have never used any modules that I didn't have to. At this point, I use
none. They are all compiled into the kernel, because I don't have a point
to unloading or loading. The only point for modules in any of my
experience is if you're often changing hardware (possibly a laptop with a
base station... or something?)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-12 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-12 5:24 [gentoo-user] Module philosophy: Compile-in or Load Anthony E. Caudel
2006-06-12 5:30 ` Teresa and Dale
2006-06-12 6:20 ` Anthony E. Caudel
2006-06-13 3:35 ` Teresa and Dale
2006-06-12 5:37 ` gentuxx
2006-06-12 5:44 ` Steven Susbauer [this message]
2006-06-12 6:31 ` Mike Huber
2006-06-12 6:33 ` Mike Huber
2006-06-12 6:23 ` Kristian Poul Herkild
2006-06-12 8:39 ` Michael Weyershäuser
2006-06-12 14:05 ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-06-12 21:47 ` Anthony E. Caudel
2006-06-12 23:10 ` Mike Huber
2006-06-13 0:40 ` Ryan Tandy
2006-06-17 11:17 ` Mick
2006-06-17 13:40 ` Michael Weyershäuser
2006-06-17 13:42 ` Anthony E. Caudel
2006-06-17 17:08 ` Mick
2006-06-17 17:28 ` Erik Westenbroek
2006-06-18 12:46 ` Michael Weyershäuser
2006-06-12 18:16 ` Evan Klitzke
2006-06-12 18:38 ` Jarry
2006-06-12 19:16 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-06-12 21:00 ` kashani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0606112243250.872@ladonis.lannet \
--to=stupendoussteve@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox