From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKkb4-0007AP-7t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:40:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8SMVJUX029926; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:31:19 GMT Received: from megahappy.net (82-182-31-216.tierzero.net [216.31.182.82] (may be forged)) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8SMPLMv018573 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:25:22 GMT Received: by megahappy.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F96E4C001; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by megahappy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D04068006 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:32:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Bryan Whitehead To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Size of portage tree In-Reply-To: <200509281721.06072.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Message-ID: References: <87oe6d5q8s.fsf@newsguy.com> <200509281552.17882.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org> <877jd15mal.fsf@newsguy.com> <200509281721.06072.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 8defb483-343d-4e84-b0c8-e7e14d8647dc X-Archives-Hash: 25d651efd7fa88236b301a0aeed024de > no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small files > (like portage tree) than ext2/3. The only problem with this "solution" is you are then stuck using reiserfs... :D -- Bryan Whitehead Email:driver@megahappy.net -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list