From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DwK0R-0008Ma-3h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:25:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6NDO2ap017641; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:24:02 GMT Received: from vuosaari.hai.fi (vuosaari.hai.fi [62.142.210.66]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6NDIlwv014991 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:18:47 GMT Received: by vuosaari.hai.fi (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 0C46E2BC0F; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:15:57 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vuosaari.hai.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0838937B63 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:15:57 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:15:57 +0300 (EEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tero_Grundstr=F6m?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] thunderbird/firefox conflict In-Reply-To: <42E240CB.6070400@planet.nl> Message-ID: References: <64e8d2f20507222031348526ec@mail.gmail.com> <200507230116.31196.rutski89@gmail.com> <42E1D542.9000002@gmail.com> <42E225CD.1020605@planet.nl> <42E240CB.6070400@planet.nl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1908522286-605943224-1122124557=:28996" X-Archives-Salt: 3f2396b9-edea-4949-8cd2-7b05fc9523d2 X-Archives-Hash: 4b8532956d4be9b6d6cfb29a64a5c937 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1908522286-605943224-1122124557=:28996 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote: > Tero Grundstr=F6m schreef: >> >>> In any case, I'm not having any problems with firefox or tbird 1.0.6-r1 >> >> >> That's the real paradox here. I don't remember when was the last time I >> had a problem with ff (actually I use only Galeon these days, compiled >> against ff) so it feels so stupid to compile it just because of these >> revision bumps > > No, you actually *did* have to upgrade to 1.0.6-- there was a GLSA for > 1.0.5, for which 1.0.6 was the fix. Actually, I was talking about revision bumps, not version bumps. But no, I don't *have to* to upgrade anything, GLSA or not. Unless you=20 come here and put a gun on my head ;) -- T.G. ---1908522286-605943224-1122124557=:28996-- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list