From: "Tero Grundström" <tero@vuosaari.hai.fi>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] thunderbird/firefox conflict
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:44:40 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507231502530.28996@vuosaari.hai.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42E225CD.1020605@planet.nl>
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Holly Bostick wrote:
> I've gotta say, I'm getting tired of upgrading them (I saw the upgrade
> to 1.0.6 two days ago, but waited; there was an upgrade to 1.0.6-r1,
> which I took yesterday afternoon, and today I have to upgrade to 1.0.6-r2).
I'm getting tired of it too. I would understand this upgrade cycle with
some smaller packages, but ff and tb are huge programs to compile this
often.
And as if bumping the revisions were not enough they keep deleting the
previous versions from the tree making it hard to mask the new ones:
If the old one is gone, you just cannot add the new one to your
package.mask file - you also have to put a "fake" ebuild to your local
portage tree. Otherwise portage will want to *downgrade* with emerge -u
world. Or worse, complain about missing packages if the current one is
the only one in the tree, as it was with firefox-1.0.5-r1.
> In any case, I'm not having any problems with firefox or tbird 1.0.6-r1
That's the real paradox here. I don't remember when was the last time I
had a problem with ff (actually I use only Galeon these days, compiled
against ff) so it feels so stupid to compile it just because of these
revision bumps (yeah, I know - you don't *have to* upgrade, they'll
say - but then again, read what I said above).
> I was going to post a question as to whether anybody knew how many more
> revisions we're going to see to the Mozilla programs in the next couple
> days; I understand heavy development, but three upgrades in three days
> is a bit much even for me (since it takes an hour and a half or so to
> compile each program, and further means I have to use Konq for that time
> if I don't want to mess up ff by having it loaded while it's upgrading.
Hmmm... I don't see how it could mess ff this way.
> So I'd love to know if this is likely to settle down soon, if anybody
> happens to follow the relevant development.
Relevant? But is it really...? ;-)
--
T.G.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-23 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-23 3:31 [gentoo-user] thunderbird/firefox conflict Ryan Sims
2005-07-23 5:16 ` Patrick Rutkowski
2005-07-23 5:27 ` Zac Medico
2005-07-23 11:11 ` Holly Bostick
2005-07-23 12:44 ` Tero Grundström [this message]
2005-07-23 13:06 ` Holly Bostick
2005-07-23 13:15 ` Tero Grundström
2005-07-23 13:15 ` Benno Schulenberg
2005-07-23 13:29 ` Holly Bostick
2005-07-23 14:02 ` Tero Grundström
2005-07-23 14:23 ` Tero Grundström
2005-07-23 15:14 ` Holly Bostick
2005-07-23 15:49 ` Tero Grundström
2005-07-23 20:00 ` Ryan Sims
2005-07-24 17:20 ` Neil Bothwick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0507231502530.28996@vuosaari.hai.fi \
--to=tero@vuosaari.hai.fi \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox