* [gentoo-user] Best Tomcat performance?
@ 2005-10-17 16:48 A. Khattri
2005-10-17 17:05 ` Dave Nebinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: A. Khattri @ 2005-10-17 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Which combination of Tomcat and JVM gives the best performance?
(or is this question not relevant?)
--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Best Tomcat performance?
2005-10-17 16:48 [gentoo-user] Best Tomcat performance? A. Khattri
@ 2005-10-17 17:05 ` Dave Nebinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Nebinger @ 2005-10-17 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Monday 17 October 2005 12:48 pm, A. Khattri wrote:
> Which combination of Tomcat and JVM gives the best performance?
> (or is this question not relevant?)
I'd say irrelevant. Basically your performance will be controlled by the
amount of memory you have, the number of child daemons you allow, and the
basic speed of your system.
Each instance is going to require a big chunk of memory to stay resident and
not get swapped out; if your limited on memory you're going to find yourself
swapping like crazy and performance is going to blow.
You should try to identify how much memory each process is consuming then
adjust the number of child processes to keep them within the amount of
available memory.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-17 17:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-17 16:48 [gentoo-user] Best Tomcat performance? A. Khattri
2005-10-17 17:05 ` Dave Nebinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox