From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E7zKL-0007xd-MR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:46:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7OHhqwh018682; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:43:52 GMT Received: from mail.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7OHbIsk008196 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:37:19 GMT Received: (qmail 46317 invoked by uid 0); 24 Aug 2005 17:38:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ida.bway.net) (216.220.96.4) by smtp.bway.net with (EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Aug 2005 17:38:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:34:54 -0400 (EDT) From: "A. Khattri" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Lost Labyrinth In-Reply-To: <200508241012.51814.mar_doe@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <200508220706.43245.mar_doe@gmx.de> <200508232131.10893.mar_doe@gmx.de> <1124865552.5942.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200508241012.51814.mar_doe@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j7OHhqx2018682 X-Archives-Salt: 28bfae2e-8f9b-44f3-b9f3-9f47accb5241 X-Archives-Hash: e81e79886c05ea210123a435ed5770f5 On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Markus [utf-8] D=C3=B6bele wrote: > The code I think is not the problem. But I think it is still a lot of w= ork. > By the way I don't like C too much (we had a C Version once and only > encountered problems all the time :-( Buffer overflows and all this nic= e > stuff is a big problem of this language!) You mean it requires understanding pointers and attention to detail? Yes it does. An assembly programmer should find C easy (well I did anyway). > I started as a Assembler Programmer on the Atari ST (68000 Rulez!!!) I started on the 6502, then 68000 then 8086... > But all this is too much effort. Purebasic has a very syntax and for a = basic > dialect a very good performance. Shame BBC Basic isn't around anymore - it allowed you to mix assembler an= d BASIC (and that basic at the time was one of the few that allowed recursion ;-) --=20 --=20 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list