From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G5lxL-00068p-SD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:09:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6QG6vob018178; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:06:57 GMT Received: from sas3.stonline.sk (sas3.t-com.sk [213.81.152.136]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6QG4apW027655 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:04:36 GMT Received: from av3.stonline.sk ([192.168.133.65]) by sas3.stonline.sk (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k6QG4amN012908 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:04:36 +0200 Received: from smtp.t-com.sk ([192.168.133.65]) by av3.stonline.sk (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k6QG4Ze8012902 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:04:35 +0200 Received: from amit.kihnet.sk (adsl-d58.87-197-128.telecom.sk [87.197.128.58]) by smtp2.stonline.sk (STOnline ESMTP Server) with ESMTPA id <0J3000A6OPZL0A@smtp2.stonline.sk> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:04:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by amit.kihnet.sk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 558985C81A0; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:04:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:04:23 +0200 From: Robert Cernansky Subject: Re[4]: [gentoo-user] How packages becomes stable? In-reply-to: <7573e9640607252358j202ab3d3k4c00749bf429a5e9@mail.gmail.com> Sender: mjlkcher@stonline.sk To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mahogany 0.66.0 'Clio', compiled for Linux 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 x86_64 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: INLINE References: <7573e9640607251348w6ccfd9eu4729e48bcffe413a@mail.gmail.com> <7573e9640607252358j202ab3d3k4c00749bf429a5e9@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 9b2416a8-2d7d-4780-8920-949d3a434b33 X-Archives-Hash: ad0a29e931708868c72cc2b7b91fa953 On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:58:23 -0700 Richard Fish wrote: RF> On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky wrote: RF> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:48:17 -0700 Richard Fish wrote: RF> RF> > RF> Regardless, if there are packages you feel are ready to go RF> > RF> to stable, you can file bugs on bugs.gentoo.org to RF> > RF> request stabilization. RF> > RF> > Of course I can but I want to point out that this should happen RF> > occasionally. I reported several packages to be keyworded for amd64 RF> > year ago and none of them is stable yet. So it seems to me that RF> > this is not "bug", this is a "rule". RF> RF> Are these packages stable for x86? Yes, they are stable for x86. One of it (app-emulation/fuse) have no maintainer. Robert -- Robert Cernansky E-mail: hslists2@zoznam.sk Jabber: HS@jabber.sk -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list