From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D7851396D0 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3C911FC04C; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957F91FC015 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D35FAD535 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (w1.tutanota.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCyKprKii6Pl for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:34:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from w1.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.162]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69D5FAD4F8 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:34:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tutanota.com; s=20161216; t=1503930841; bh=46rcxZJfcoWdaOTRFRKvTadE2F/RsZne6PRFEyEjMjg=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=X39axAzsyG8spSCGe25hrApcSMGhnnrgIHbSJfRdXgA0eCW4jFwMY1NhRePAFSzmt 0suQhG8KtmEdQh0MB+dZMBZGpK5R6++FpYI4/33j4/f0K6I9r8onzCGLBE/jU6/Nzq QdGpdfyfVntXuw9aPX7xbPymSKt+QLfIw2CIzP9ILZYjPUscdr9+y9t2QCsHVUQOqM iwnhT3Ma86q0Y80jgFOc/ol+ZnhNRFLdPScknnZ/CsWu9COiq9QZJO/s/oCn6f3NMo bQ8hCtc89lH4S0j2olQ7VWHHgYiCB1F3hMJqtxfXsQD/xFqYCDgkaXz06oTa25ZPSo P7DjFLoVByc7A== Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:34:01 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <> <319cb05c-203a-ab1a-a574-73677f37e804@gmail.com> <> <7c4d1cd2-5f60-ba93-c3da-e104020a9898@gmail.com> <<7c4d1cd2-5f60-ba93-c3da-e104020a9898@gmail.com>> <3279108.D6Qq8pKqTD@eve> <<3279108.D6Qq8pKqTD@eve>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_71285_1543221878.1503930841721" X-Archives-Salt: 98042b71-1751-4078-8ebb-e38cbcdef29c X-Archives-Hash: ea9d045a6aa2809b72a4931456f81156 ------=_Part_71285_1543221878.1503930841721 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable correct, i plan to soon use someone with encryption and a "normal" non web = based reader.=C2=A0 i know there are other providers for this.=C2=A0 sorry = about the top postine, yes it's very clumsy just to try bottom posting.=C2= =A0 the problem with unencrypted or merely ssl encryption is it's severly b= roken, when i've made a secure connection, and correct info shows up with t= he wrong cert it's pretty obvious who's be rude and wasting resources.=C2= =A0 of course lots of sites have totally broken certs, and you probably kno= w that for ssl there are 3 sets of binary numbers that nearly everyone does= .=C2=A0 then again in 6 months i'll likely be using my own email accounts o= n my hardware. -- The Power Of the People Is Stronger Than The People In Charge. 21. Aug 2017 12:04 by Rasmus.thomsen@protonmail.com: > The problem with email providers which store all emails encrypted ( as in= end-to-end ) is that they usually require a specific app ( providers could= be protonmail, tutanota etc. ). Both of which don't support bottom posting= ( well ), at least on mobile devices > > Rasmus > > > -------- Original Message -------- > On 21 Aug 2017, 19:56, J. Roeleveld < > joost@antarean.org> > wrote: >> >> On Monday, August 21, 2017 6:44:07 PM CEST Dale wrote: =20 >> > >> mad.scientist.at.large@tutanota.com>> wrote: =20 >> > > precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the = =20 >> > > "subject" line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that = =20 >> > > mistake. =20 >> > =20 >> > > 21. Aug 2017 09:37 by >> rdalek1967@gmail.com>> : =20 >> > No problem. By the way, top posting is sort of frowned on. However, we= =20 >> > also realize some devices don't play well with bottom posting. If = =20 >> > possible, set it to bottom post. If not possible, oh well. ;-) =20 >> =20 >> I use multiple devices. All of which can be set to bottom-post. =20 >> Might need a better email app, but that should not be an issue. =20 >> =20 >> -- =20 >> Joost =20 >> =20 >> =20 ------=_Part_71285_1543221878.1503930841721 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit correct, i plan to soon use someone with encryption and a "normal" non web based reader.  i know there are other providers for this.  sorry about the top postine, yes it's very clumsy just to try bottom posting.  the problem with unencrypted or merely ssl encryption is it's severly broken, when i've made a secure connection, and correct info shows up with the wrong cert it's pretty obvious who's be rude and wasting resources.  of course lots of sites have totally broken certs, and you probably know that for ssl there are 3 sets of binary numbers that nearly everyone does.  then again in 6 months i'll likely be using my own email accounts on my hardware.

--
The Power Of the People Is Stronger Than The People In Charge.


21. Aug 2017 12:04 by Rasmus.thomsen@protonmail.com:

The problem with email providers which store all emails encrypted ( as in end-to-end ) is that they usually require a specific app ( providers could be protonmail, tutanota etc. ). Both of which don't support bottom posting ( well ), at least on mobile devices

Rasmus


-------- Original Message --------
On 21 Aug 2017, 19:56, J. Roeleveld < joost@antarean.org> wrote:

On Monday, August 21, 2017 6:44:07 PM CEST Dale wrote:
> mad.scientist.at.large@tutanota.com wrote:
> > precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the
> > "subject" line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that
> > mistake.
>
> > 21. Aug 2017 09:37 by rdalek1967@gmail.com :
> No problem. By the way, top posting is sort of frowned on. However, we
> also realize some devices don't play well with bottom posting. If
> possible, set it to bottom post. If not possible, oh well. ;-)

I use multiple devices. All of which can be set to bottom-post.
Might need a better email app, but that should not be an issue.

--
Joost

------=_Part_71285_1543221878.1503930841721--