From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49791138CDF for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25B37E083E; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay117.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay117.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.144]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEEBFE0839 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:03:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=i+EX5EtM4g4P/CrLY+sx2nOWHsqv9AlVwqc0uudqMuE= c=1 sm=2 a=NimUR-UY4PkA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=0PuEd8tBiPryb0slao8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2BhBgDOAXtV/zJLsFtcgxDEMIJQBAICgUA9EAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEDATocKAsLRhApHohADAG4cp4Ui0OEUzoWhBcFtxomY4EoHIFUPIJ4AQEB Received: from 50.75-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO numa-be.localdomain) ([91.176.75.50]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2015 18:03:48 +0200 Received: from numa-be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numa-be.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113F9C09D6 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:03:47 +0200 From: Helmut Jarausch Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Backgammon (GNU) anybody To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: In-Reply-To: (from grant.b.edwards@gmail.com on Thu Jun 11 21:32:23 2015) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.5.2-2-g8a4db2d Message-Id: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 5b52545c-3019-43b0-929c-2acbaad812f5 X-Archives-Hash: 2b8e1e9d034e54b182cbd883ef3caaff On 06/11/2015 09:32:23 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > I got curious and just did "emerge -av gnubg". It compiled and > installed fine, and it seems to work. =20 Many thanks, it turnt out to be a strange problem. When compiled with gcc-5.1.0 and -O2, gnubg goes into a tight loop within m= emset=20 even before function main is entered. When compiled with gcc-5.1.0 and -O1, gnubg gets a segment fault from withi= n memset=20 even before function main is entered. When compiled with gcc-5.1.0 and -O0, it works just fine. Stepping back to gcc-4.9.2 it succeeds even when compiled with -O2. So, it looks like a compiler error of gcc-5.1.0 Helmut. =