From: Jack <ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 17:40:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FD775ZRI.PDORU6PR.BCKWBKMX@2I7IUQ6S.4B7NAYRQ.Y76XNIU7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46403e55-e11d-aa8a-d1fe-8fc4b3a93e8d@web.de>
You seem to not really understand how gentoo works.
On 2020.12.04 17:19, n952162 wrote:
> On 12/4/20 11:13 PM, n952162 wrote:
>> On 12/4/20 10:49 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
>>> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 <n952162@web.de> wrote:
>>>>> I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me
>>>>> which
>>>>> ones
>>>>> I need. I'll try that. But isn't '=' more restrictive than '>=',
>>>>> promising me troubles earlier?
>>> The earlier you encounter any conflicts, they're generally easier to
>>> solve.
>>>
>>>
>>>> No, that didn't work. After about 4 iterations of supplying newly
>>>> required USE flags, I ended up with this
>>>>
>>>> (this after commenting out all the python dependencies in
>>>> /etc/portage/package.use/* and adding back in what emerge wanted):
>>>
>>> Hard to say what the problem is when I don't know what you've added
>>> back to USE, but I wonder what state your portage tree is in,
>>> because
>>> it seems like many of the packages creating your conflicts, like the
>>> two below, dev-python/ipaddress and dev-python/futures, don't exist
>>> at
>>> all in my tree. They were removed several weeks ago. When did you
>>> last
>>> sync? If recently, when did you last --depclean?
>>>
>>>> dev-python/setuptools[python_targets_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]
>>>>
>>>> required by (dev-python/ipaddress-1.0.23:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>>>> USE=""
>>>> ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"
>>>>
>>>> dev-python/setuptools[python_targets_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-)]
>>>>
>>>> required by (dev-python/futures-3.1.1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>>>> USE="-doc"
>>>> ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Arve
>>>
>>
>> Okay, I've never done a depclean. Is that something I need to do? I
>> mean, I'm always worried it'd remove something that I need, but given
>> all the problems I have, I guess that'd be the lesser of evils...
Most of the time, yes, you do need to do a depclean. It's pretty
common to do it after every world update. In general, it gets rid of
things emerged as a dependency of something else, and no longer needed,
either because you explicitly removed what pulled them in, or that
package was modified to no longer need it.
>>
>> I'll give that a go and go to bed.
>>
>
> Oh that went fast. But just as I expected ... it's going to remove
> kernel/gentoo-sources? gcc? The llvm that took 5 hours to compile?
Do you understand why it shows separate lines for "selected" and
"omitted"
>
> >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 4.19.72
> protected: none
> omitted: 5.4.72
It's going to remove an old version and leave a newer version. If you
really want the old one kept, you should explicitly add it to your
world file. (check "emerge -n", don't actually edit the world file)
>
> dev-lang/mujs
> selected: 1.0.5
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-fs/btrfs-progs
> selected: 4.19
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> virtual/shadow
> selected: 0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> media-libs/gegl
> selected: 0.3.34
> protected: none
> omitted: 0.4.22
>
> dev-python/sphinx_rtd_theme
> selected: 0.2.4
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-go/blackfriday
> selected: 1.2_p20150720
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> media-gfx/mypaint-brushes
> selected: 1.3.0-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.0.2
>
> dev-lang/vala
> selected: 0.42.7
> protected: none
> omitted: 0.48.9
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau
> selected: 1.0.16
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> media-gfx/potrace
> selected: 1.15
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-dummy
> selected: 0.3.8
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-apps/sdparm
> selected: 1.10
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-python/sphinxcontrib-websupport
> selected: 1.1.0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-lang/vala
> selected: 0.46.7
> protected: none
> omitted: 0.48.9
>
> virtual/python-ipaddress
> selected: 1.0-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 5.4.66
> protected: none
> omitted: 5.4.72
Same as above, and no, I don't know why it didn't combine these into a
single entry with two selected and one omitted.
>
> dev-python/bz2file
> selected: 0.98
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-python/asn1crypto
> selected: 0.22.0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> app-text/docbook-dsssl-stylesheets
> selected: 1.79-r4
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-vesa
> selected: 2.4.0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> x11-libs/wxGTK
> selected: 3.0.4-r2
> protected: none
> omitted: 3.0.4-r302
>
>
> !!! 'app-editors/nano' (virtual/editor) is part of your system
> profile.
> !!! Unmerging it may be damaging to your system.
>
>
> app-editors/nano
> selected: 4.2
> protected: none
> omitted: none
This seems a bit odd, unless you have a different app-editor package
installed. Virutal/editor is there so you always have at least one
editor installed. If you do have another editor installed, then this
is OK.
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 5.4.60
> protected: none
> omitted: 5.4.72
Again, as above. How many versions do you have installed, and how many
do you want to keep around?
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel
> selected: 2.99.917_p20190301
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-python/pyxattr
> selected: 0.6.0-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-devel/clang-runtime
> selected: 10.0.0
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> app-admin/metalog
> selected: 20181125
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-libs/cracklib
> selected: 2.9.7
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-libs/iniparser
> selected: 3.1-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-libs/libcroco
> selected: 0.6.13
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse
> selected: 1.9.3
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> virtual/python-enum34
> selected: 2
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-video-fbdev
> selected: 0.5.0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> media-libs/freeglut
> selected: 3.2.1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard
> selected: 1.9.0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> app-text/openjade
> selected: 1.3.2-r9
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> media-libs/portmidi
> selected: 217-r3
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> virtual/cargo
> selected: 1.37.0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> selected: 5.4.38
> protected: none
> omitted: 5.4.72
>
> dev-libs/libpthread-stubs
> selected: 0.4-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-python/pyblake2
> selected: 1.1.2
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> virtual/python-typing
> selected: 0-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-go/sanitized-anchor-name
> selected: 0_pre20151027
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-python/sqlalchemy
> selected: 1.3.3
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-python/whoosh
> selected: 2.7.4
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-libs/compiler-rt
> selected: 10.0.0
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd
> selected: 3.0-r4
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> x11-libs/libXScrnSaver
> selected: 1.2.3
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers
> selected: 10.0.0
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> dev-python/typing
> selected: 3.7.4.3
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> virtual/glu
> selected: 9.0-r2
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> media-libs/glu
> selected: 9.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-devel/gcc
> selected: 8.3.0-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: 9.3.0-r1
Again, as with gentoo-sources, it's just removing an old version.
>
> sys-devel/gcc
> selected: 9.2.0-r2
> protected: none
> omitted: 9.3.0-r1
Two old versions.
>
> sys-devel/binutils
> selected: 2.32-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.34-r2
Again - there are many slotted packages where you no longer have any
reason to keep the older version(s) around, no matter how long it took
to install them.
>
> sys-devel/binutils
> selected: 2.33.1-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: 2.34-r2
>
> sys-devel/clang
> selected: 8.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-devel/clang-runtime
> selected: 8.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-libs/compiler-rt
> selected: 8.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers
> selected: 8.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-devel/clang
> selected: 9.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-devel/clang-runtime
> selected: 9.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-libs/compiler-rt
> selected: 9.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers
> selected: 9.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-devel/llvm
> selected: 9.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> sys-devel/llvm
> selected: 8.0.1
> protected: none
> omitted: 10.0.1
>
> virtual/libffi
> selected: 3.3_rc0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-apps/rescan-scsi-bus
> selected: 1.57-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> virtual/modutils
> selected: 0
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> app-admin/killproc
> selected: 2.13-r1
> protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> sys-apps/sg3_utils
> selected: 1.42
> protected: none
> omitted: none
You need to check this list carefully. If it is going to remove
anything you really want to keep, add it to the world file. In cases
where it is removing old version(s), you should be fine, unless you
know some reason the old one is still necessary for you, but this seems
unlikely.
>
> All selected packages: =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-5.4.66
> =media-libs/glu-9.0.1 =sys-devel/llvm-8.0.1
> =app-text/openjade-1.3.2-r9
> =media-libs/portmidi-217-r3 =virtual/cargo-1.37.0
> =dev-python/sqlalchemy-1.3.3 =sys-devel/gcc-8.3.0-r1
> =sys-devel/llvm-9.0.1 =dev-python/sphinxcontrib-websupport-1.1.0
> =sys-devel/clang-runtime-8.0.1 =x11-libs/wxGTK-3.0.4-r2
> =media-gfx/potrace-1.15 =x11-drivers/xf86-video-dummy-0.3.8
> =sys-apps/rescan-scsi-bus-1.57-r1 =dev-libs/libcroco-0.6.13
> =dev-go/blackfriday-1.2_p20150720 =sys-devel/gcc-9.2.0-r2
> =app-admin/metalog-20181125 =sys-libs/cracklib-2.9.7
> =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-5.4.60 =sys-devel/clang-runtime-10.0.0
> =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-5.4.38 =dev-python/typing-3.7.4.3
> =dev-lang/vala-0.42.7 =media-libs/gegl-0.3.34
> =media-gfx/mypaint-brushes-1.3.0-r1 =virtual/shadow-0
> =dev-python/bz2file-0.98 =sys-libs/compiler-rt-10.0.0
> =dev-python/asn1crypto-0.22.0 =virtual/glu-9.0-r2
> =sys-devel/binutils-2.32-r1 =sys-apps/sg3_utils-1.42
> =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.19.72 =virtual/python-enum34-2
> =x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.917_p20190301 =dev-lang/mujs-1.0.5
> =app-editors/nano-4.2 =dev-python/pyblake2-1.1.2
> =app-admin/killproc-2.13-r1 =sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-10.0.0
> =dev-python/whoosh-2.7.4 =x11-drivers/xf86-video-vesa-2.4.0
> =sys-libs/compiler-rt-8.0.1 =dev-python/sphinx_rtd_theme-0.2.4
> =sys-fs/btrfs-progs-4.19 =sys-devel/clang-8.0.1
> =virtual/libffi-3.3_rc0
> =sys-devel/clang-runtime-9.0.1 =x11-libs/libXScrnSaver-1.2.3
> =sys-devel/clang-9.0.1 =virtual/modutils-0 =sys-apps/sdparm-1.10
> =media-libs/freeglut-3.2.1 =dev-lang/vala-0.46.7
> =x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard-1.9.0
> =x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau-1.0.16
> =dev-go/sanitized-anchor-name-0_pre20151027
> =x11-drivers/xf86-video-fbdev-0.5.0
> =x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse-1.9.3
> =app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd-3.0-r4 =sys-libs/compiler-rt-9.0.1
> =dev-libs/iniparser-3.1-r1 =sys-devel/binutils-2.33.1-r1
> =virtual/python-typing-0-r1 =sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-8.0.1
> =dev-python/pyxattr-0.6.0-r1
> =app-text/docbook-dsssl-stylesheets-1.79-r4
> =dev-libs/libpthread-stubs-0.4-r1 =virtual/python-ipaddress-1.0-r1
> =sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-9.0.1
>
> >>> 'Selected' packages are slated for removal.
> >>> 'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed.
Explicitly stated, just so you know.
>
> Packages installed: 969
> Packages in world: 285
> Packages in system: 43
> Required packages: 897
> Number to remove: 72
Jack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-03 20:33 [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why n952162
2020-12-03 20:48 ` antlists
2020-12-03 21:04 ` Matt Connell (Gmail)
2020-12-03 21:06 ` tastytea
2020-12-03 21:11 ` Adam Carter
2020-12-04 8:13 ` n952162
2020-12-07 12:31 ` John Covici
2020-12-07 12:59 ` Arve Barsnes
2020-12-07 13:07 ` John Covici
2020-12-03 22:04 ` Victor Ivanov
2020-12-03 23:08 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-04 8:41 ` n952162
2020-12-04 8:53 ` Arve Barsnes
2020-12-04 9:10 ` antlists
2020-12-04 9:35 ` n952162
2020-12-04 10:07 ` Arve Barsnes
2020-12-04 19:52 ` n952162
2020-12-04 20:00 ` n952162
2020-12-04 20:25 ` n952162
2020-12-04 21:49 ` Arve Barsnes
2020-12-04 22:13 ` n952162
2020-12-04 22:19 ` n952162
2020-12-04 22:40 ` Jack [this message]
2020-12-05 8:48 ` n952162
2020-12-06 12:32 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-05 9:06 ` n952162
2020-12-05 9:41 ` n952162
2020-12-05 10:13 ` Dale
2020-12-05 11:06 ` n952162
2020-12-05 13:42 ` Victor Ivanov
2020-12-06 6:46 ` Dale
2020-12-12 22:08 ` n952162
2020-12-12 22:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-13 0:09 ` Dan Egli
2020-12-13 19:31 ` n952162
2020-12-13 19:48 ` n952162
2020-12-13 20:49 ` Arve Barsnes
2020-12-13 19:56 ` cal
[not found] ` <32af647f-a0e1-77e7-ff0f-4a5495e45f6b@web.de>
2020-12-13 8:18 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-13 8:57 ` n952162
2020-12-13 9:55 ` Michael
2020-12-13 21:10 ` n952162
2020-12-13 21:51 ` Dale
2020-12-14 0:04 ` Michael
2020-12-14 6:58 ` n952162
2020-12-13 10:07 ` n952162
2020-12-13 10:09 ` n952162
2020-12-13 22:10 ` Walter Dnes
2020-12-20 16:49 ` Peter Humphrey
2020-12-13 18:58 ` n952162
2020-12-13 19:48 ` Mark Knecht
2020-12-13 20:06 ` Dale
2020-12-13 21:02 ` n952162
2020-12-13 21:14 ` n952162
2020-12-13 21:40 ` Dale
2020-12-14 6:38 ` n952162
2020-12-13 21:31 ` Dale
2020-12-14 3:46 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2020-12-14 6:47 ` [gentoo-user] " n952162
2020-12-13 21:39 ` antlists
2020-12-14 6:50 ` n952162
2020-12-13 23:41 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-13 23:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-14 3:54 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2020-12-14 6:54 ` n952162
2020-12-14 8:43 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-14 8:51 ` Dale
2020-12-14 10:17 ` Wols Lists
2020-12-14 12:55 ` n952162
2020-12-14 16:32 ` Michael
2020-12-14 23:38 ` antlists
2020-12-14 23:47 ` Grant Edwards
2020-12-13 8:49 ` [gentoo-user] " n952162
2020-12-04 22:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-05 8:54 ` n952162
2020-12-06 12:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-04 10:08 ` Adam Carter
2020-12-29 22:07 ` [gentoo-user] update fails, but I don't see why [PROGRESS] n952162
2020-12-29 22:16 ` n952162
2020-12-29 22:32 ` Dale
2020-12-29 22:55 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-30 0:05 ` Michael
2020-12-30 0:21 ` Dale
2020-12-30 7:26 ` n952162
2020-12-30 7:22 ` n952162
2020-12-30 9:53 ` Michael
2020-12-30 7:42 ` n952162
2020-12-30 8:35 ` Arve Barsnes
2020-12-30 11:56 ` n952162
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FD775ZRI.PDORU6PR.BCKWBKMX@2I7IUQ6S.4B7NAYRQ.Y76XNIU7 \
--to=ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox