From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nk3vI-0007JU-RQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:12:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DC33E0D95 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE795E0B4D for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:58:20 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,528,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="169609906" Received: from unknown (HELO compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org) ([213.152.39.90]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2010 22:58:20 +0000 Received: from funf.stroller.uk.eu.org (funf.stroller.uk.eu.org [192.168.1.71]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D63A3325E for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:58:16 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: From: Stroller To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20100223090934.3ce1c62a@digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Graphical usenet client - alternative to Knode Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:58:18 +0000 References: <67701443-6E08-476C-AF00-5F6BB156E643@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20100223090934.3ce1c62a@digimed.co.uk> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Archives-Salt: e092d3f9-dc77-406d-a71a-bf25772be865 X-Archives-Hash: a87729f2ea8f3d362262f8762736d29a On 23 Feb 2010, at 09:09, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:42:25 +0000, Stroller wrote: > >> Some comments were made recently about KDE4, where it was advised >> "don't try using just Kmail under a different window manager - use >> the >> whole KDE environment, but not single apps. Use something else >> instead >> of Kmail". > > I took it more as "KDE programs are intended to be run on KDE, so > don't > complain if they don't work as you want elsewhere". So if it works and > you are happy with it, why change? Well, duh! I'm not really happy with it. Not with all the dependencies. And whilst I see why they're necessary regarding KDE's future direction, I'd prefer to be without them. Stroller.