From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Eupp7-0000dU-PL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:31:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k06BSpIC015471; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:28:51 GMT Received: from lmfilto01.st1.spray.net (lmfilto01.st1.spray.net [212.78.202.65]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k06BQFPV023161 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:26:15 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lmfilto01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C6C308DDE for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:26:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmcodec04.st1.spray.net ([212.78.203.80]) by localhost (lmfilto01.st1.spray.net [212.78.202.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13651-03 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:26:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmcodec04.st1.spray.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cmcodec04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 153D4CA58A for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:26:15 +0000 (GMT) Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=lycos.co.uk; h=From:Subject; b=LJrelpNHtx6TkGxQeERP+cF8llAiUovhhcjtImqI2Dq+JNsatSfJsNeWYq3xpAebo9iRTuzlBY7cnF1xLX4nbDa1XBOaB1HkfC3tZIzjKLYJvNREpTwJfk/BysM+BgTyDs+0xd/s/c1RahrMcFXidgD/wS0iMJRR9NWvZWu2YSA=; From: "Michael Kintzios" To: Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge sync Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:26:12 -0000 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at spray.net X-Archives-Salt: b11856bf-c2b7-48f8-904d-0d917704efc9 X-Archives-Hash: 951176e1299453a73d02819b8d2e584e > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Peter > Sent: 06 January 2006 10:40 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge sync > > > On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:35:03 +0100, ddup1 wrote: > > > hi > > > > why emerge sync is sometime very long, at the step update > portage cache, > > sometime it takes 1mn and sometime lot longer ? > > Portage problem. Will be better next release I hear. Search > the forums and > search the newsgroup for portage, metadata, cache for more info. Most > often, hangs at 50-51% while redoing KDE. Defrag or moving > /usr/portage to > its own partition has been known to help. Read some of the posts. My experience has been that defraging /usr/portage brought enormous speed up, but just once or twice. Soon after the darn thing slowed down again. Looking forward to the next portage version. :-) -- Regards, Mick -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list