From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34AD1382C5 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E1AEE0BE1; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092001016.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.1.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C29D3E0AF0 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:50:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=IDmAKMv6vr5NeZCjBuQAmCC4LIHEFWQN5Td7Akc7j/8=; b=HV20Z3J5jC3812UxW/rm83f9XwvKE9W3BUpy2lBr5Xf5TszE4S6/s0BX/9B6tMsVxuA3au8MJv980U9fSw1ED4rKQGPJJGAK3ZxPtoHpAc1J22XPVKlXMfSNDUzfEQO/2V8Up9Poh+tLB3ttn55oKUmwfHKJvb6HGg3cOqg8S1QxsLHIJKbhyXrA/oLWW1mQUGnKh48sPw0Np3lLE9mz/6SLqd9spzja1Cl3nkWgsd0Vf3hRBDIOl8uHCgP4cAJ9tELqC8BKRAerlEPM/koDqnM98wvThwTg6YD25+gBWDK9wxsNJgTIhxoa17ZeBlCMPlkOBgxfTiDeztfu9H4V6A== Received: from SN1NAM01FT014.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.64.56) by SN1NAM01HT196.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.65.167) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.464.11; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:50:58 +0000 Received: from DM5PR15MB1722.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (10.152.64.52) by SN1NAM01FT014.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.65.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.444.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:50:58 +0000 Received: from DM5PR15MB1722.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.109.145]) by DM5PR15MB1722.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.109.145]) with mapi id 15.20.0464.016; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:50:58 +0000 From: Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor To: "gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org" Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs Thread-Topic: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs Thread-Index: AQHToQT09qDgbxrtoU2edwfmHL/KgqObBmYAgAANUICAAAOMAIAAAcGAgAAAqVE= Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 22:50:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:BAD7A5375C19D4448F6350E464C46A3DC9E0A2435C3031FE45C19691E3DBF7B2;UpperCasedChecksum:EEEC40AB495DEA97FE3A7A5CF8A184B147119B3E28F6CE325BE7B7787B004F5E;SizeAsReceived:7279;Count:45 x-tmn: [LeTCI+PI6UvtBp+AvbRyTmD30rx1XqhI] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;SN1NAM01HT196;6:+vo+cHFWQi7uZ+2OLLyrZW6wFOmMLW0Z/Vv29alA5DlIDY9HWmKLGBwyGVdFU+kpQxx4cEKIl2GCkqecFrHg54NMGJ84NWrsBEc+VjbG98FSC1p5YA0WHtsSDK9OP9/yLTUNLc6+yQMOSUjXsSkMHcdPy0sA28UIb7xMVqAPi0Tt7+lBbjL0ocgJQMqj+Ppx0D8QALzK20ZQaZ9/QXQcAsm5xobVOkoGHDAnq1fQ/qP4Fe5OYimAflHs/IZygjLbzEvu8IRKxX+e4iA7EG78qP1j4NiAHdykL/GfvospshQ5fKZjYrYqDMZBLKepUG+syViQaFeV0OjhSDpD+dtu2d0ScHhSDffkkIVhZIiLw20=;5:frENkwweBIFNkeVA/9POKMhLDBlJKNJh56mZPYkhagFk/Q+ac31kKNjQXIFVPx/o1+vt9rfzBklMZqpdZqDHfJpmHkkRtPyTc0+rNGmxPmKYUYhWBkxhe3AwhI+HdAeiBpQS84w3C95skZdzifsQCDi0vNWIEbHiz2ub2sikDuA=;24:0byurAUwSULF8cP6/C4aKhWz4cK3Cz48sz94Iw0jqwRfhK/hCudV6PBNb2VGsYxGtvBBojge7EWhWMdlqRifnvsWTjM6klXv8vXa4WfYsfY=;7:zsyBZKRjYBemKmVwXtWwphc39lP9r+DfxdOm0j5PIWItXjRK0T6r4XbIZ85PZeBedQIQc1szwDjtFbasRpOPPCkbEjW3Cvo0I2rqjP4Be2KIzK4NAzHxz59enkv+cpImEsOc7APH0PFzQ0LCTBiDjVcoXEQiiCmgsOc0lKQIgtEvUcaly3qLwbxQiXSxzmA88hpHz+glz3FlEMXcu/NXzrQ8z3cAsHLdBoiB0OztEb7XDu37XZlsh5uZJzUb1kOj x-incomingheadercount: 45 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(7020095)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045);SRVR:SN1NAM01HT196; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1NAM01HT196: x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 13f5bc0a-4865-4948-bdf6-08d56f466b82 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(444000031);SRVR:SN1NAM01HT196;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1NAM01HT196; x-forefront-prvs: 0577AD41D6 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(7070007)(98901004);DIR:OUT;SFP:1901;SCL:1;SRVR:SN1NAM01HT196;H:DM5PR15MB1722.namprd15.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR15MB1722BAECEA3360F79AF67F3AF0F30DM5PR15MB1722namp_" Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 13f5bc0a-4865-4948-bdf6-08d56f466b82 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Feb 2018 22:50:58.4448 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM01HT196 X-Archives-Salt: c7b43d91-2010-4f0a-b5b9-7cdabaa91b20 X-Archives-Hash: d8d7c9c427c136cd086586cd9d653a4c --_000_DM5PR15MB1722BAECEA3360F79AF67F3AF0F30DM5PR15MB1722namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ________________________________ From: freemanrich@gmail.com on behalf of Rich Freem= an Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 5:38 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:32 PM, gevisz wrote: >> 2018-02-09 0:19 GMT+02:00 Nikos Chantziaras : >>> On 08/02/18 23:31, gevisz wrote: >>>> >>>> I do not use ccache, and in my /var/tmp I only have /var/tmp/portage >>>> and /var/tmp/genkernel (I use genkernel to generate initramfs image). >>>> >>>> I never use emerge and genkernel at the same time. So, why not to put >>>> the whole /var/tmp into one tmpfs? >>> >>> >>> Well, someone here posted that /var/tmp is supposed to persist between >>> reboots. >> >> In this case it would be nice to hear a reason. >> That's why I have asked if it does not harm. >> >Countless linux systems are configured to not preserve it between >reboots, FHS notwithstanding. That said, whether you preserve it >would probably make the difference between whether sticking ccache in >there is a good idea or not. >Personally I don't preserve it, because lots of stuff that has no need >to persist ends up in /var/tmp. I put stuff that should stick around >someplace else with a suitably liberal tmpreaper policy. >-- >Rich Just adding my 2 cents EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=3D"--fail-clean" helps a ton wit= h tmpfs. As for the athlon x2 system, consider using distcc, I've been using it for = quite awhile, I don't think it helps with the ram usage --_000_DM5PR15MB1722BAECEA3360F79AF67F3AF0F30DM5PR15MB1722namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



From: freemanrich@gmail.com= <freemanrich@gmail.com> on behalf of Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.o= rg>
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 5:38 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs
 
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:32 PM, gevisz <gevisz@= gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2018-02-09 0:19 GMT+02:00 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.c= om>:
>>> On 08/02/18 23:31, gevisz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I do not use ccache, and in my /var/tmp I only have /var/t= mp/portage
>>>> and /var/tmp/genkernel (I use genkernel to generate initra= mfs image).
>>>>
>>>> I never use emerge and genkernel at the same time. So, why= not to put
>>>> the whole /var/tmp into one tmpfs?
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, someone here posted that /var/tmp is supposed to persist= between
>>> reboots.
>>
>> In this case it would be nice to hear a reason.
>> That's why I have asked if it does not harm.
>>

>Countless linux systems are configured to not preserve it between
>reboots, FHS notwithstanding.  That said, whether you preserve it<= br> >would probably make the difference between whether sticking ccache in >there is a good idea or not.

>Personally I don't preserve it, because lots of stuff that has no need<= br> >to persist ends up in /var/tmp.  I put stuff that should stick aro= und
>someplace else with a suitably liberal tmpreaper policy.

>--
>Rich


Just adding my 2 cents EMERGE_DEFAULT_O= PTS=3D"--fail-clean" helps a ton with tmpfs.
As for the athlon x2 system, consider using distcc= , I've been using it for quite awhile, I don't think it helps with the ram = usage


--_000_DM5PR15MB1722BAECEA3360F79AF67F3AF0F30DM5PR15MB1722namp_--