From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4F31396D0 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70ACD1FC073; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw2.antarean.org (gw2.antarean.org [141.105.125.208]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EC41FC003 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw2.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0C4121C10 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:06:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at antarean.org Received: from gw2.antarean.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gw2.antarean.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1E9nL88OKndz for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:06:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailstore1.antarean.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw2.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C82121BAA for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:06:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lan001.nl.antarean.org (lan001.nl.antarean.org [10.20.13.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailstore1.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CDA032 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:09:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <319cb05c-203a-ab1a-a574-73677f37e804@gmail.com> <7c4d1cd2-5f60-ba93-c3da-e104020a9898@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly?? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: "J. Roeleveld" Message-ID: X-Archives-Salt: 0c896d4e-bb69-4f20-95f0-a3aee928894a X-Archives-Hash: 305c1548053baf998921662e74e88318 On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: >Thomas Mueller wrote: >> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, >except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) >where multipart/alternative went through=2E >> >> I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by >default, and might design an email client to not support >multipart/alternative at all in composed messages=2E >> >> Tom >> > >Someone pointed out that it likely did that with that message because >the message I was replying to was HTML=2E It seems that if I reply to a >HTML message, it ignores my settings=2E I think it should obey the >settings regardless myself as settings should override what it is >replying too=2E=20 > >At least I know that messages by default are being sent correctly=2E=20 >That >should correct the vast majority of them=2E=20 > >Thanks again to all=2E > >Dale > >:-) :-)=20 Some mail clients have a different setting for when replying=2E Maybe you = missed that one? Or that should be added=2E -- Joost --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E