From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4TBx-0005q2-Os for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:51:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7F0nmkc024150; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:49:48 GMT Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.83]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7F0gswW021887 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:42:55 GMT Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j7F0hHp3022961 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (cpe001217fa060b-cm0013718c1a36.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.24.10.222]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j7F0hFXa016325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: <20050815093712.EFBD.NICK@rout.co.nz> References: <6C3F87F2-A3F1-47A5-A18E-A3632967B781@mac.com> <42FFA5AF.3070904@gmail.com> <20050815093712.EFBD.NICK@rout.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Hoy Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo or Linux from Scratch - Perspectives? Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:43:14 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-Archives-Salt: be2341f4-1b0b-45e6-9186-4c6fd99407b5 X-Archives-Hash: 27b4fa80e39f4a5a97c3dc5e88484ac2 On Aug 14, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Nick Rout wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:12:31 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Are we really far behind? That's difficult to believe. For what >> packages specifically? Do >> > you know how to unmask unstable packages (marked M or M~ at > packages.gentoo.org)? > > Unstable does not really cut it IMHO. I am a gentoo enthusiast through > and through, but plonking something in portage with a ~ beside it does > not constitute a release of a recent version IMHO. > > > >> >> Zac >> > > -- > Nick Rout > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > Hi Nick, Yup, I've unmasked a few packages .. openoffice_ximian, for instance. Paul -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list