From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3807D13845F for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05CCA21C0D0; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BCACE001F for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id fk20so3211947lab.36 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:07:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XKe+4kFiTyxxZWig7x4Mc//gL4sonp6mPstwoLcPfv0=; b=MnEbanuPmGDQJ3moDEeQD7/92R31isP9HIjHXxJcCEIn8TJo99LN4O0Ab8kiphUn1x o1kEpktYwIsHtwVEGgWtSp10hEQgnV5BLgJEsbllPUPKHhtkfzSMvicVgaeeKGPWiPtv HK8XMGYvLZD5u7Azcu2Xrd8WoL5MtK7jtn1wqhWltbKPDHc/Dx27bAVmotRis6Bg0nAM rgmsjW+RIeDEIvuuXe37TayDiCB14ph+5WYHx5dFurJmwo/fuW0njXdpB10GpZWejEwt ObBwBE2SeSu+nCcBDlq8cExm5cvPRckBxblvyCHGNHjHWNgbpcQgAt2MmC8xGaXImvg1 PGgg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.109.238 with SMTP id hv14mr21205922lab.30.1358104076350; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.30.106 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:07:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50F2FA41.2050702@hanft.de> References: <50F2FA41.2050702@hanft.de> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 11:07:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What does "#" mean in emerge output? From: Chris Stankevitz To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 3c294075-bbf6-4b75-89ff-0cef143b3c8f X-Archives-Hash: 38dddc8d5397f7f7762dea6a0e95cef4 On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Matthias Hanft wrote: > So your package seems to be masked by an entry in /etc/portage/package.mask. Matt, Thank you. I read that very section but missed the definition of "#" somehow. FYI in this case the package is masked by the devs and unmasked by me in /etc/portage/package.unmask. Chris