From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D8F1381F3 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63540E0CAA; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com (mail-pb0-f49.google.com [209.85.160.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9B3E0C83 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id xb4so2485342pbc.22 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:53:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=xVY3YcpbD2SIhJh/CYfB0YhAX/NoHxZbhruGGfNCAFM=; b=AF6FDABKZ5hWGmvz67YbJ9Ctp+hU4M8syd31CX7CApoGjlAPCHhkXw5wur/RGbv9l2 tqSsZe9jJwxiBCwXLEV+qUq2F7jIzKPI+BwcJ6exXKv/wporVuzIbose6TTU/SGfu7t+ wSWDLIkKxbD8u7wjHEhgZFb1J3jjiMZbncWpcnjrlCbwbxMxEH4V2tM/w95qQFxLchfP kq10nJkyR+WvCXnQlnyhsNg+uD7/N1RRhdD0NUufYGMZL2ojcXYTXAnLq2ZdrGCFb5mY dGtU9YudTK8E5R6omb30FSWkDtZQrRw+TGcPOAq0KXQcC8R+Zj0cSoTZcSznOoIHwNfp yPSA== X-Received: by 10.66.170.168 with SMTP id an8mr22013191pac.58.1379181210193; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.41.135 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:53:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130914061251.GA3655@solfire> References: <20130914061251.GA3655@solfire> From: "AR (aka AleiPhoenix)" Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 01:53:10 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] To be updated or not to be updated, Second Part To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc9a481d556904e65ba62b X-Archives-Salt: 60672df7-2105-4eb6-89ab-a0aadfaf12ff X-Archives-Hash: 37c69fa91212863c46bcff27cbb379a1 --047d7bdc9a481d556904e65ba62b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:12 PM, wrote: > > beagleboneblack:/root>eix x11-libs/fox > [D] x11-libs/fox > Available versions: > (1.6) *1.6.40 *1.6.45 ~*1.6.49 > (1.7) ~*1.7.40 ~*1.7.41 > {(+)bzip2 debug doc (+)jpeg (+)opengl (+)png profile tiff > (+)truetype (+)zlib} > Installed versions: 1.7.39(1.7)(23:22:36 08/07/13)(bzip2 jpeg opengl > png truetype zlib -debug -doc -profile -tiff) > Homepage: http://www.fox-toolkit.org/ > Description: C++ based Toolkit for developing Graphical User > Interfaces easily and effectively > > So, what is about x11-libs/fox? Delete it? Dont delete it? > > Best regards, > mcc It depends on is there any package relying on x11-libs/fox. Checkout by using `equery d x11-libs/fox-1.7.39`. Or you can checkout that with `emerge -DNuav @world` and `revdep-rebuild`, these commands will check for any unsatisfied dependencies. -- Silence is golden. twitter: @AccelReality wikipedia: AleiPhoenix blog: weblog.areverie.org wiki: wiki.areverie.org --047d7bdc9a481d556904e65ba62b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:12 PM, <meino.cramer@gmx.de<= /a>> wrote:
=

beagleboneblack:/root>eix x11-libs/fox
[D] x11-libs/fox
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Available versions:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(1.6) =C2=A0*1.6.40 *1.6.45 ~*1.6.49
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(1.7) =C2=A0~*1.7.40 ~*1.7.41
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0{(+)bzip2 debug doc (+)jpeg (+)opengl (+)png pro= file tiff (+)truetype (+)zlib}
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Installed versions: =C2=A01.7.39(1.7)(23:22:36 08/07/13= )(bzip2 jpeg opengl png truetype zlib -debug -doc -profile -tiff)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Homepage: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.fox-toolki= t.org/
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Description: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 C++ based Tool= kit for developing Graphical User Interfaces easily and effectively

So, what is about x11-libs/fox? Delete it? Dont delete it?

Best regards,
mcc

It depends on is there any package rely= ing on x11-libs/fox.

Checkout by using `equery d x= 11-libs/fox-1.7.39`.

Or you can checkout that with= `emerge -DNuav @world` and `revdep-rebuild`, these commands will check for= any unsatisfied dependencies.=C2=A0

--
Silence is golden.

twit= ter: @AccelReality
wikipedia: AleiPhoenix
blog: weblog.areverie.org
wiki: wiki.areverie.org

--047d7bdc9a481d556904e65ba62b--