From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-131824-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RVozG-0008V4-N3
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:34:30 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB73B21C060;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E0B21C03E
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:32:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so786716vcb.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:32:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=SyxUF3Uyww8ASGU0Jonk6BjAwk/70b3EbFeDCGzRnd0=;
b=d0IAVgVv2v6hulSdYcddE73wLM3hq+G/xTjh46zyl9rUdIT83Jy/axqxC6CO+yad4a
0yBoYsqNXPgh7aRWAAdvUcgQsrRfRZkU6cvboZLinh4cZNr093aBKFSev4Ga9awjzzC+
KqlEIMLVbFColMtil2XgYIjOK9w5vTE27bRNk=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.107.202 with SMTP id c10mr677081vcp.131.1322677962630;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.188.104 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:32:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <jb5r80$23o$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <CAPFNKCJwCPKgW4guD_XaiMjx-Ln9AoSb1F1wPVF+dja8ru8gaQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20111130152753.176a9a08@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
<CAPFNKCJm0BP8NA-7ULdD+D+=4br-vjuUp+cOf7EB0k2YvfzeJg@mail.gmail.com>
<jb5r80$23o$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:32:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPFNKCJZGRUXJHqaJ3XA2vihOx2wGUcq=N8awcOT7cPt5F9+mw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Full disk encryption
From: czernitko <czernitko@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043891211d665c04b2f7f6ef
X-Archives-Salt: 30a943f1-3b4d-4a07-8153-d59c1287e5ba
X-Archives-Hash: 7aed10a893bb6a2c8266a4207a3dbf61
--f46d043891211d665c04b2f7f6ef
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Yup, establishing encrypted partition for /home was easy as a pie using
cryptsetup. I was considering using truecrypt as it offers multiplatform
support, so I could access encrypted partition even from my dualbooted
windoze, but I didn't want to put effort into something not as well
documented (how-toed) as dmcrypt.
As for initrd, I believe it has a lot of advantages, but as long as I can
avoid it, I don't see any reason why to spend time learning that stuff and
making my kernel deployment more complicated. I know that one day I will
have to learn that stuff. But as far as it is not today, it makes my day
even better :)
Thanks for all your responses!
Peter
--f46d043891211d665c04b2f7f6ef
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yup, establishing encrypted partition for /home was easy as a pie using cry=
ptsetup. I was considering using truecrypt as it offers multiplatform suppo=
rt, so I could access encrypted partition even from my dualbooted windoze, =
but I didn't want to put effort into something not as well documented (=
how-toed) as dmcrypt.<br>
As for initrd, I believe it has a lot of advantages, but as long as I can a=
void it, I don't see any reason why to spend time learning that stuff a=
nd making my kernel deployment more complicated. I know that one day I will=
have to learn that stuff. But as far as it is not today, it makes my day e=
ven better :)<br>
<br>Thanks for all your responses!<br><br>Peter<br>
--f46d043891211d665c04b2f7f6ef--