From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-142171-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65115138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:38:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1BA5E0660;
	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:38:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E5321C11C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:36:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id wz12so2487976pbc.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=Ci1LwSH6GndfrwueXh0g5pniXiEjHfJiGh9F0mFdIo4=;
        b=ANNIklOucKc5m09f25mNtKeMrhDpDeOrnQ8TXuY2re1lwawNFN3nKtMvLY53NMXjHh
         f2VjCHLPMVr0jqnfp253UXRddFbEADE5xyFDmKt7PxW2Fenrz1liBNBxy1XS7RmNgFlS
         xf3tvxps3B0joiYM6ULAsD+iV0XQrCW7KrR5fZTh/ur4on0YDqO/Wpg9del2gzcyLnTh
         riyqauNb7shlYoN+Kx7OrOY+5dd34CqnY25cr2vGWqlaOmXs/CK6Y4YZbzU2I2kkdPrC
         U/zJ2L4qpb0kmJK8ZOYfvQz+iHml2kkkS4qAsGig0wo7UxTwAjhKKoPUZUfZ27Op3Xxb
         qtTg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.221.225 with SMTP id qh1mr67782827pbc.50.1351240598304;
 Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.5.170 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:36:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOq67MBt2tgAWYTX2qwYcaLpq18erJafmraXOBu397+QTV+yeg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Raid system fails to boot after moving from 2.6 kernel to 3.5
From: Pau Peris <sibok1981@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff255c0de388e04ccf2378e
X-Archives-Salt: eaa5fbb9-012e-4545-9724-0d09b58a94b2
X-Archives-Hash: c9764228a531ae00604d03ecb0b8d7b7

--e89a8ff255c0de388e04ccf2378e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,


i'm running GNU/Gentoo Linux with a custom compiled kernel and i've just
migrated from a 2.6 kernel to a 3.5.


As my HD's are on raid 0 mode i use a custom initrd file in order to be
able to boot. While kernel 2.6 is able to boot without problems the new 3.5
compiled kernel fails to boot complaining about "no block devices found".
After taking a look at initrd.cpio contained scripts i can see the failure
message is given by mdadm tool.


Does anyone has a clue about that? Thansk in advanced. :)

--e89a8ff255c0de388e04ccf2378e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


<p style=3D"margin:0px">Hi,</p><p style=3D"margin:0px"><br></p><p style=3D"=
margin:0px">i&#39;m running GNU/Gentoo Linux with a custom compiled kernel =
and i&#39;ve just migrated from a 2.6 kernel to a 3.5.</p><p style=3D"margi=
n:0px">
<br></p><p style=3D"margin:0px">As my HD&#39;s are on raid 0 mode i use a c=
ustom initrd file in order to be able to boot. While kernel 2.6 is able to =
boot without problems the new 3.5 compiled kernel fails to boot complaining=
 about &quot;no block devices found&quot;. After taking a look at initrd.cp=
io contained scripts i can see the failure message is given by mdadm tool.<=
/p>
<p style=3D"margin:0px"><br></p><p style=3D"margin:0px">Does anyone has a c=
lue about that? Thansk in advanced. :)</p><div><br></div>

--e89a8ff255c0de388e04ccf2378e--