From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-161809-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C486F138A1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 18:29:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C78AE08DF;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2015 18:29:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com (mail-la0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA7EDE0845
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 18:29:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ms9so43854422lab.1
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:29:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=DoW+FpLGjmCNOYaAXhUGgPU00vSXgLMH0cgU6R0nJDE=;
        b=VM1RtkdCzQhPpN+ALoS/zh8qALPjGIt0HTneuC7b5cWNzFbIBUZnc6dngS2E/x1nxG
         juVaFjQM+4/2Oy/sotBhJt1egAq5xmacUIbfUwe7/Tp9ELzpb7cPpEkgkQ08K+9LDBvy
         KYRXpU5Mx+PKKlNSbhbaNRXatL/txnz/VhtifEtresB500JMEHAY/AkNWC8AAmuYJvSy
         rHk0RpvW7/hZXDJgXuvxEIWmz6NljbbgOsK+pKm7OQ9rwMO+Sk8MRYh0tn+bKkAeNXtz
         w5XBXuQ/UpNCB2sK4lcY9KVvyQPgCRLaRHBBQU3Mj2spk9te8TvRe9pPrOxj33kVh27e
         3HJA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.4.102 with SMTP id j6mr20836281laj.95.1422901773212;
 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.116.102 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:29:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <mamghs$ken$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <mam573$aop$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<mama2s$i8i$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20150202003234.1cf5ff91@hal9000.localdomain>
	<mamghs$ken$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:29:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOdo=Szw38ruqUX-Qdk5ODV3WPQnhoru-9h=EwHszNwugyrpbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [NOTE] New default behavior in latest nfs-utils (1.3.2-r1)
From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 914601fd-ba8f-4554-bf77-2ba4013872db
X-Archives-Hash: 312da56c551d996b7d9d4c91ebdfb9ab

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:31 PM, walt <w41ter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For example, I had to add the rpcbind.service to the multi-user
> systemd target because even nfs3 seems to need it.

You must mean "because especially nfsv3 needs it" because,
theoretically, nfsv4 doesn't need rpcbind since an nfsv4 mount only
needs to now about rpc.nfsd's default port 2049.