From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159049-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97FD13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:57:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 989D5E0A96;
	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483E6E07DF
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q1so8596230lam.7
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=eP2UJ+5hUl2ZZ4RGVNVqmeSnvtJeAtBD0lg7g2JDDKw=;
        b=xIb4GnTdGcPtag64dZDQFyBTxG16/mv0SSa1sftGvNOAaE4d8a3JOZnQz6aWsMnoLZ
         hkMGTmsO9YpC1DuKOUPv8PrkWyNFRB+xb3ULqvIGPByGd1WxbZI1E3FMEV4ZghRCO3MY
         mN8PfN1cSwZsulagml/l2HGLm+8EJHhlMefHB70lT2Ln6UzAWzfjDzZlXhpDwfT+pvZr
         2Y6Frp8/4ogwx0a0xSk10l4OJT/t/Y7PIbj8Kf/rA5bpwL64/xRpHhmvh1VclIgW8KSz
         cUcIBuWQomT4m8egR8wA9WtjVW8rHxYOJWBOo/HPFNoICYhgF8G3bN+4u96OTT4kisFG
         sqrQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.5.9 with SMTP id o9mr12261531lao.95.1412092650454; Tue,
 30 Sep 2014 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.22.168 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20140930T150641-575@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20140930T150641-575@post.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:57:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdo=Szbt5nB9cwdFo+v6rg6R7mSj=ubCHRYScg+c_fo8iL_YA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] root on newest livedvd ?
From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 75949931-e190-4b5f-9a09-c047398f6bda
X-Archives-Hash: a48d454168e3b43e098e605a326870a1

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:09 AM, James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> livedvd-amd64-multilib-20140826.iso
>
> The old livedvd, to get root access it was "sudo su -"
>
> which does not see to work. Ideas on the new
> syntax to get root access.

How about "sudo -i" or "sudo -s"?