From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159556-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532101388E5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:49:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C1AEE094E;
	Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:49:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4767CE08F3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 03:49:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id u10so6959891lbd.34
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=zXNFsYjjeIBgOxOFhBM1jt+s3u0ISkV2402qajiQqFA=;
        b=MbrXB+5K/Jzr+IeS6B5c04Uj3XyD8zpmAC6dfCZTbem3E+n/uf2am+PBoZJ8LNrudH
         M5ShqQbztnI8s01CY8t2kzAYkoGjo4gMsWvPB2ST3cAyssKLxzfkMsmqNdjCunkudsQa
         0NHgvmU++L5FI3ETFOFkyDlgJb0ChDKdwC1O1lmFfJiNloc7T4XN5fD/Aq1YaRntHwD3
         oeb9gQeWtNp4x4jI8XBSJvlWMHKFOJoyDwt1np2lPB5zuFadbRnF9gv/EPFl2qaO+QQ3
         AJ6FFi22ejry6JYmTW5to3U4OPWhfuzJO0vJsmQxqmYWcD9U/5XW2m4krpbkZnO6/WVq
         TuoQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.54.229 with SMTP id m5mr641471lbp.11.1414468169676; Mon,
 27 Oct 2014 20:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.22.168 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_m1CUbj=vEpPAiNoSYK7-FD-3vULnpfT-8+8r_MgXMrLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201410270924.40381.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
	<544E2875.5000309@gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_mbyhQ4hWW20h7g0WmR8Xx5iNVK1dFjSm=pcW9kNrcp4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<201410271522.32452.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_kYd0dVS4Wd3JG=dgacTUVDy+NrPUpuDAGC2WexnOTo=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<544E7F83.4020303@googlemail.com>
	<CAGfcS_m1CUbj=vEpPAiNoSYK7-FD-3vULnpfT-8+8r_MgXMrLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:49:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdo=SyFs=Y55Lo70nfQ-J2SJEHOA4VUxXNXRJwwvvb1GNVHAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Safeguarding strategies against SSD data loss
From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: e08be791-8828-440f-ae0b-866ffcc8ac9b
X-Archives-Hash: 9366849fc7686631fb52fe29ccd532b8

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Am 27.10.2014 um 16:36 schrieb Rich Freeman:
>>>
>>> and a boot
>>> partition as I don't think grub supports it - it could be a bit of a
>>> PITA for a single-drive system.
>>
>> nope. But I don't see any reason to use zfs with a single drive either.
>
> True, not needing to use FUSE does simplify things, but I don't
> believe that grub supports zfs, so you would need a boot partition.
> Granted, a newer laptop would need that for EFI anyway.

# ls /boot/grub/x86_64-efi/z*
/boot/grub/x86_64-efi/zfs.mod  /boot/grub/x86_64-efi/zfscrypt.mod
/boot/grub/x86_64-efi/zfsinfo.mod

so you only need "/boot/efi" to be a fat partition.