From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-181307-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE05E139083
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:23:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54646E0FD3;
	Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:22:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com (mail-wr0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBEBE0F4A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:22:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id s66so17994456wrc.9
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:22:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=jkPE6aR0KWMCT32YvJmRNVf+WdqC5dWip13TSGs3c/g=;
        b=b5rbo0bEm2Sse8JHCzHTPWUmlEuXUXTlT9KYAYNoMiyL3hJ2/Fwu+/un1mzwQmZg9W
         S+u+1l5StAjCbcWW96/zhdjYEEfPLn1wjG6g7IkoyjQY3bsq0SEW1jMLKwVCMfvN94HU
         nkJxP5HBris35KWqm3Fv+Y+dsBuyaI9HXJLj6xwrQz7HiBAltAr8IjNgNlJBj7HWWp/R
         +9dNOZylAZ2Ow1KdaRxF0Gv/C91+SFWIjJgsCi2vGDW6eb+TWKDZhISKtNLUrWqGT/Cb
         2hgGBcaXFHe+cfDyX7w5Bdcloga+1WXhKzao+9uxMoSAeI84Xxt2SEv2GvfFcYmhVt89
         c8Bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=jkPE6aR0KWMCT32YvJmRNVf+WdqC5dWip13TSGs3c/g=;
        b=FVlvFw0c7DRQkbB9lkvOAqdvWSZp+nPP368yz6d/LvFGnRyuYtf1xsOe/d7DeBty1r
         GjgBDPqnh4LeuHUY7bOquFNHOmcUF8bW9KFoHFN7XQJr3S0WMJhkDnzHK6e9T9s6Uu/X
         ARcSErRpjDJxJslj82mBQBaUOwiPZzi6aiMSguSzdky5qa6mmG6w1jIk7a+rLrSYTqHK
         zlD6f0iC40PkC6uEjj2hxLbw2UxWeBLCEtIzaqat2P3EqWyd3JeWnCXwFAyJqkiN11oe
         vvLXsqwyaYrGMBgPL8c/9jSWF42vcvtMy6aZikNof+gx31IkF7+eKP9K4l/pZNQwHlDC
         7T4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJhv3KNI1GZvmQvEIRlATLTG2Uu+nDQuPzaaGrelCz1rRSCw69L
	ScOMCgMHjaQ/G+sKPq0Z00FLJ+Gbjs/J3bUlaa4zlA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovXoFQu5C11xIDNpiKpWiUE2Dl4XpQKa1J4meA7vqfm7qvVQtjksq/mVO0/aKZwv0jaeitLfoLq6SFaq0hNowU=
X-Received: by 10.223.152.66 with SMTP id v60mr681112wrb.277.1513005773325;
 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.159.79 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:22:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20171210230802.GA26035@waltdnes.org>
References: <6582741.F9gJHCEsXr@dell_xps> <p0ge71$7je$1@blaine.gmane.org>
 <2343494.DDJaQvByiF@dell_xps> <6cb25230-9803-2bd4-ee69-66504d0d1822@gmx.com>
 <c7ad1cbf-6fba-b40d-dc9c-715d4cbd6c49@gmail.com> <5A2D04A1.6090101@youngman.org.uk>
 <20171210101330.GA5671@ACM> <5A2DA0E0.8080303@youngman.org.uk> <20171210230802.GA26035@waltdnes.org>
From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:22:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOdo=SyEYFRTGi7q7of7x-EPRn4tDmLihY-tz4EGFSAGjXzt4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 20bb93db-9bd5-406f-9f04-4ccd42dc09c9
X-Archives-Hash: 57d0d5b3ecd439c8b7a8a01667cafd13

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 09:02:24PM +0000, Wols Lists wrote
>> On 10/12/17 10:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>
>>> I've no idea how good systemd is. It's not been through the normal
>>> process of choice and selection that other successful packages have.
>>> It was forced on people. But being forced to have a binary system log,
>>> being forced (so I have heard) to have an http server running, ....,
>>> doesn't make it an attractive package for me.
>>
>> Oddly enough, although the details are different, that passage I've
>> quoted pretty accurately describes how I feel about Gnome ... :-)
>
> I can't find it right now on Google, but I vaguely remember that
> Lennart asked the Gnome people to make systemd a hard dependancy. Not
> much later logind, which is required by Gnome, picks up systemd as a
> hard dependancy.

It was in 2011. The rationale was to use hostnamectl and localectl via
the gnome gui apps that set the hostname and locale and to replace
consolekit with logind for gdm and gnome-session. (Ubuntu showed with
upstart and systemd-shim that you could do all three with a different
init system.)