From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-155898-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EFC1381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 19:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BEB3E0999;
	Wed, 21 May 2014 19:44:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f193.google.com (mail-ie0-f193.google.com [209.85.223.193])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A193E0969
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 19:44:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f193.google.com with SMTP id rl12so686486iec.4
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=1aVChRCg+q3iX4XSfex40/EsPUqipB4qM2jPTtr7JEw=;
        b=reouclrM4ph4/43SOwrvMvNEqe3fAu+lsEiQaUoOieKAwbHiGKkIIX6wcV9UMQ/jue
         Vrlt63GLR3rXE0lOKjiEu/+TI6vV7OOj9B6s1ynZTlN4Ouq67wuNvWSCEulE+tbmDQ69
         YJrPxEzAUeuPzZzEUXDNcvO6m6Q7TuYGm9VCInB+O4O1dPvTvtAk5BAN5gWvf1ZGgXy5
         fRQXTRrkchnqwtUMBlrF9cblTISE9E1MmPXIwOH+8Q1U0Sww18Jctn14OWUI57ZI7P12
         BwG9TUhdOGr2hDBV95XHqTkO2xL0hLPmY61KInvzNC0yLop8I4rrxV6A0laS4ONlVVr9
         E2eA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.79.195 with SMTP id l3mr16676973igx.36.1400701444630;
 Wed, 21 May 2014 12:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.133.70 with HTTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <537CE803.5040007@xunil.at>
References: <537C80BC.3070305@xunil.at>
	<CAOdo=SyJe7rpUw2hkymNE8Nk2u-A=vTdZqmctWuQLKUkLp=EEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<537CE803.5040007@xunil.at>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:44:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdo=SwS51DasjNjvvHEPs3Bgss-xi+wyp+7+nJxmderG14ULA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] fstab cleanup
From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 233d4c4d-69b8-4dbd-8d6f-bd5bebf296ea
X-Archives-Hash: f1a232a19c201b2a5a6de3e6844ec815

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@xunil.at> wrote:
> Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@xunil.at> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern
>>> systemd/gnome3-environment?
>>>
>>> # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
>>> # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink).
>>> # (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will
>>> #  use almost no memory if not populated with files)
>>> tmpfs                   /dev/shm        tmpfs
>>> nodev,nosuid,noexec     0 0
>>>
>>>
>>> /dev/cdrw               /media/cdrecorder       auto
>>> user,exec,noauto,managed 0 0
>>
>> From "src/core/mount-setup.c":
>>
>> { "tmpfs",      "/dev/shm",                  "tmpfs",
>> "mode=1777", MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV|MS_STRICTATIME, NULL,
>> MNT_FATAL|MNT_IN_CONTAINER },
>
> So the answer is "no" ?

The answer is "no" unless you want to apply different perms to "/dev/shm".