From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-162659-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801DF138ACE
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  8 Mar 2015 17:24:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 911D8E0AA0;
	Sun,  8 Mar 2015 17:23:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461DDE0A5C
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  8 Mar 2015 17:23:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbiz12 with SMTP id z12so38837286lbi.12
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=y0M61/6xlGatPsl7dfXIJ+GilVLKhnqN/uYRJVmfyK4=;
        b=BP0+mAKsE1vu5IExpMvWcHxpRD5iYbrY1QETOtTJ9Vu5K4Qc8VZDjbOaloafvC1OTz
         bfqkB0gq4nrkhKhd9OZHqrZZgs3XTjpfH4dMq/abYW8g45RhHVmcP0OguZNe3ii0tSqd
         K6eF1uj1i7T1FQz4EfIsAtTQgGeQ8UDJG656p4WW4cNwXT1ykWUkAPQfglZbl8Ds8WF3
         DnjuDO3xlFXFLzlYYPYRY9WrJoT8u5GErweFmh/+QdsGfCDxJ5EZXwNrOnoMA28oN215
         C3Sufmx8qzAZVoPvkCKrFPHcERgV5AT5A8rYSqWDHDAAqlvW48ZC1Bz7MwAXWYnzhvGC
         8tVQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.23.195 with SMTP id o3mr21297773laf.11.1425835435721;
 Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.162.74 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150308170517.0dfb8f9d@digimed.co.uk>
References: <54FC6C04.6030705@xunil.at>
	<CAOdo=SxsNUWZZO3pKTsW65vKRN0CubRrP_ex8PSNMq=0YievcA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADPrc83kyQH3eq4sJxbasfCa-XaFuA3abFtXXJPD8ziFvKCi2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150308170517.0dfb8f9d@digimed.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 13:23:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdo=Sw+Ti56iiq_3X2+P5Wg9tn8eqOUSfdxzMAkrzqggLiVTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gummiboot does not display new kernel
From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 251a4010-a69d-45ca-abe4-7456575524f0
X-Archives-Hash: b55e56d9eec98ffbbce09e30c4bca612

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote:
>>>
>>> Are the ownership and mode of
>>> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
>>> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
>>> formatted correctly?
>>
>> The /boot partition in UEFI systems needs to be vfat. Permissions are
>> not gonna matter that much in that.
>
> But filename lengths may do. What is the maximum length for FAT32? Is it
> possible both files are considered the same?

It's 255 or 256.