From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2791381F3 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4098E0D2E; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com (mail-ve0-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD98AE0D05 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id pa12so5503309veb.30 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 05:19:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=dQ/qI6mQEYGAnQxlncAgMO6570Jkf+yoDZywCocSo6Y=; b=Th/YrAKmxKQyZk4WmCWy3HK5M2gZ6qju9kUf3/mVGbtE+3XJD7IZntcstq9tMUi4Ie cYsthhvBztXowh+x7KdTgWLn3px7ALU4EWDtq+MZ6gnFpfP47XiY1HxQRnPnhWNmHvyn aPX3SewmDUWQTJt/VxgtDSzlyYOyul/HUZYRVJY56GMASzJpySVDvTEVuxkPBViqb3aX fWr9HdZAFaz+Trv1iWQa9MlFuJUdXJ1OOoMfnXz+YPD6aR6R4GSUqaynZwPQmePbisBS sGhKHMBp4H6/F5cZyfJnyCiYWqCrXHvfxm/Z58YYJ+asb+sym5K4c62Y/NusU4Aq8Z5j 0qcQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.46.196 with SMTP id x4mr6164485vem.73.1376309949033; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 05:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: alon.barlev@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.255.193 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 05:19:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5208D24C.1060805@libertytrek.org> References: <51FA8CB6.60000@libertytrek.org> <51FAEEC6.9000006@iinet.net.au> <51FAF26C.2040107@gentoo.org> <20130802010100.GA31096@waltdnes.org> <51FB133F.3040409@gentoo.org> <51FB1DF5.8050802@gmail.com> <51FB2102.50102@gentoo.org> <5208C8E4.70905@gentoo.org> <5208CFDD.2080200@gentoo.org> <5208D24C.1060805@libertytrek.org> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:19:08 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eU9nbReGIhx9UYJAjDKR-26La4U Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev From: Alon Bar-Lev To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 80fc45ec-ae61-419b-bbaf-a5fac8bfe480 X-Archives-Hash: 405cb3180daec8b0b18e9f5359c009c8 On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> >> True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's >> how maintainership works. >> But trying to lie to people it's somehow solving something currently is >> annoying as 'ell and should be corrected where seen. > > > It is solving the problem of *when* (not if - if the words I have read from the systemd maintainers can be taken at face value) the systemd maintainers decide to pull the plug on the ability to have a systemd-less udev... > Correct. And because that we endorse it. Look what happened with the logind.