From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SSiGr-0004ex-JM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 05:20:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E70AE07C3; Fri, 11 May 2012 05:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FD6E0B19 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 05:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so2860668vbb.40 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 22:18:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4qNr/tUv0PEcV+b5J5A+PNoJWcm3O9E1LbeX2anjXZE=; b=AyRjJV/3g3iIi0c6lu3cAAb2LCKfBkIEpbDdEZ4M7D5EoNUprXyNmXqfS1ja+cWgxz wfc4ob+xOcQVmK4R8+hrniOZUtxB6Yljm859hCQ0eZHNe4P5ulJKpy1RpP2EdOTuoJuh hvryy2Vc4ChMdycVbgXkubIO2t0MoXlAgb6fEWV21xbddoGd8/7NbVxbeM1LS/xPTviB by8yAVAJA94/WqQ5rX7L+xydhY7ydc7i1IDLQM129HhKd/ZzVIPs/Fkw5ztxTkEd78aw 9lrnRWOegW/VTh7Ka7VXsRQnu2ZUy+RrI9Ls2IR7T27alHDxdNqrrTVKRs0Nz30bYUy1 YX8w== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.115.82 with SMTP id h18mr4403827vcq.18.1336713499001; Thu, 10 May 2012 22:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.66 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 22:18:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7141DF56A5774600B6D951E2FED9E058@mic2> References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@gmail.com> <4FAA595A.4040202@libertytrek.org> <20120510162012.74db0575@unet.univie.ac.at> <7141DF56A5774600B6D951E2FED9E058@mic2> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 01:18:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails From: Joshua Murphy To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c0797ca2-9b11-4c1c-9b84-4745b2922d89 X-Archives-Hash: d2557b523e90d0e4c4de79d48940da37 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > I'm always replying to gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org and I'm not aware I e= ver > used > one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this forum, s= o > it's > entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell me wher= e > else > I should post my replies. > And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as well p= ost > some > advice on my problem too. > > > michael > > -- > Michael Scherer > Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie > email: michael.scherer@meduniwien.ac.at > phone: +43 6991 941 22 54 > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stroller" >> >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08 >> >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails >> >> >> >> On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote: >>> >>> >>> References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@gmail.com> >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<4FAA595A.4040202@libertytrek.org> >>> >>> =C2=A0 >>> >>> =C2=A0 >>> >>> after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine >>> for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times, >>> but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors >>> started to accumulate, =E2=80=A6 >> >> >> >> Please don't hijack threads like this: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking >> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8? >> >> "It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients... >> In case you didn't know, it happens when you use "reply" for sending >> a new question instead of composing a "new" message." >> >> Stroller. >> >> He pulled those addresses from the message headers that went out with your initial question, which it appears you sent, aiming to start a new thread of discussion on, by hitting reply in the midst of "[gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?" and changing the subject. It's a quick way to get a message headed towards the list, but it *does* throw clients that are better at thread tracking for a bit of a loop (and makes it easy for your question to get lost in an already 40+ message long thread). As for your initial question, building from your config on a clean (distclean, no ccache, etc) 3.1.12 gentoo patched tree built rather quick and problem free on my box here (using -j5 at that. My first guess was a race issue in a parallel build)... You might find something notably different in your versions of things, so here's what I'm running on there. lanos linux-3.2.12-gentoo # emerge --info Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.5.3, glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos x86_64) =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D System uname: Linux-3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Quad_CP= U_Q6600_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.3 Timestamp of tree: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:30:01 +0000 app-shells/bash: 4.2_p20 dev-lang/python: 2.7.2-r3, 3.1.4-r3, 3.2.2 dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.26 sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.3 sys-apps/openrc: 0.9.8.4 sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.68 sys-devel/automake: 1.11.1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.21.1-r1 sys-devel/gcc: 4.5.3-r2 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2 sys-devel/libtool: 2.4-r1 sys-devel/make: 3.82-r1 sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers) sys-libs/glibc: 2.14.1-r3 If you're running something newer somewhere, or vanilla-sources, or somesuch I can poke around a bit and see if I can replicate your troubles here, but I can't guarantee short timeframes... I've around 1k miles of travelling this weekend, half of which will be learning quickly whether the car I just grabbed on ebay was a good idea or not. --=20 Poison [BLX] Joshua M. Murphy