From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RzGvl-0006If-QS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:16:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BCE7E0CBA; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F5DE0B08 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so3894248vbb.40 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:15:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of poisonbl@gmail.com designates 10.52.178.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.178.40; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of poisonbl@gmail.com designates 10.52.178.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=poisonbl@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=poisonbl@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.178.40]) by 10.52.178.40 with SMTP id cv8mr8585439vdc.82.1329696918582 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:15:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=76+Ql8ZEpq2vCeR5fXLNwDiD2GsPbb1kycaBLbLon94=; b=Ed8zReOXghx9jUpx72DlEXgJiosC7vpFKdIwfcdqvcXLtOXYpjCAyNcOaV9g3a+nB6 DflC3oBl4NuHNxAa7MugliVKi9347UDG7yrAVFo5MGN7LyhCfzDUdHe0SBiWZ2BfuZNX mQIf7UMoiPonEiaBHLuRY8AkODLPn6uNBlLiU= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.178.40 with SMTP id cv8mr6931414vdc.82.1329696917085; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.73.134 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:15:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:15:17 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker From: Joshua Murphy To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 37af38be-97f2-4eed-817b-ebeb72bf0aaf X-Archives-Hash: 4b00d024bbc7d5e32ffe722ba9b9f743 On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Grant wrote: > Has anyone found a screen locker they like? =C2=A0I'd like to move away > from xscreensaver. =C2=A0It seems bloated plus it isn't working right for > me anymore. > > slimlock looks interesting but the ebuild in the miramir overlay fails wi= th: > > !!! Fetched file: slimlock-9999.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED! > !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size > !!! Got: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A021746 > !!! Expected: 21479 > > and the comments in this bug aren't encouraging: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D366405 > > - Grant > I find I like slock, though it's possibly a bit excessively on the 'minimalist' side for many people. Flat blanked screen, just type the user's password and hit enter to unlock... there's no visual cues at all. It also doesn't auto-enable on a timer by itself. --=20 Poison [BLX] Joshua M. Murphy