From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SWJGB-0000g8-BW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 03:26:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 901C4E0B19; Mon, 21 May 2012 03:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gg0-f181.google.com (mail-gg0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7EDE09FD for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 03:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnv5 with SMTP id v5so4712239ggn.40 for ; Sun, 20 May 2012 20:24:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZrV0N9dtI/h4t4xsaBfEfzJ2MpfB4bReVB8iw8E0uiY=; b=T9yrwImeCKvDWsM16CbzMa4/dMaIThp4vq2IR1Nac40nwhTk575HWDL8bBS0T6/3sZ rG/jnkHAviqeD+wMjL0c1VgTDNSUG9rGZA8mV4dSzkgDGksuGddWVEFkpaBw5l51jLNi 833T8JZG5NgbLxHvoHyHKGa1dkfk20I0z2q2hYQ+dkdHqBrO5XH0b0V6knX/mjSUD2wD R1HULaMoyV9wV7D6mg2F154AcgrIHfoTa3wvFEh61QcnNbyh0msGM0u74jUD/LajQPBE CuTBb5eKi+66QOGddi+3RM8tPrLGR2iRyOc3KrJBb0WB1saDgkpYUc49npDeVGw9PC6W MMRg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.135.37 with SMTP id pp5mr5622134igb.33.1337570668242; Sun, 20 May 2012 20:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.187.231 with HTTP; Sun, 20 May 2012 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB56497.1080504@fu-berlin.de> References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@gmail.com> <4FAA595A.4040202@libertytrek.org> <20120510162012.74db0575@unet.univie.ac.at> <20120514021324.GA26071@badass.gateway.2wire.net> <335395246A21454687CDAE9ED74902EB@mic2> <4FB13D2E.10606@gmail.com> <20120514225436.196212a2@khamul.example.com> <4FB1A76F.2000503@gmail.com> <20120517181420.547327e3@unet.univie.ac.at> <20120517221302.2d87cac4@unet.univie.ac.at> <4FB56497.1080504@fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 23:24:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails From: Joshua Murphy To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f6e4ec86-8d36-449c-93fd-5499ae68196f X-Archives-Hash: 758be8acd4d275bc87839796b14288cc On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17.05.2012 22:13, Michael Scherer wrote: > >> >> 1) make output: >> >> CHK =C2=A0 =C2=A0 include/linux/version.h CHK >> include/generated/utsrelease.h CALL =C2=A0 =C2=A0scripts/checksyscalls.s= h CHK >> include/generated/compile.h LD =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0init/mounts.o ls -Al = -m >> elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o >> init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory >> make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1 make: *** [init] Error 2 >> >> There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message. >> > >> >> contains a directive to build mounts.o, see second last line, but >> it for some reason this is ignored. Maybe there is a flaw in that >> command, only I can't find it. >> >> regards, michael >> >> > > Have you tried a make clean on your sourcetree? > > CHK =C2=A0 =C2=A0 include/linux/version.h > > IS for me one of the first lines I get at all. It seems strange to me > that you get a call to the linker (LD) before even a call to the > compiler (CC). > > I'd suggest you try a make clean first and try to build again > afterwards (with -j1 or without a statement for jobs) to rule out race > conditions. > > If that doesn't help, move your kernel sources to another directory > and reemerge the sources. Copy your .config (ideally one of a working > tree) and try again. If that doesn't help, try to get a working > default config (like from /proc/config.gz from a live distro). > > WKR > > Hinnerk > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPtWSXAAoJEJwwOFaNFkYc8tAH/iV59mb5MsH0pJ28dXUqe0X6 > tcbKB18vIQYmjG9gecGX4lVtgXCIhTqVeHEKbQVN4xRMo9u7D7FxygHtRY7sfYrk > dvR9fs4RfIoykVeCF/0uVSNZnoXhixarYtr8FGvIKCxvUJnY/ws4W+k5tP8Ju8lJ > wM5ldQ/eD8H4vFm4fIStQheTGERZlueNBVf77cLx8K/8p0XBvVM85V/epg+fC4I4 > bfWG1JtXrh1MUmaE+Y26aNOXGkUZiHax49CBiOUQLZNjk6f5idGppWV03HTL4mCV > +dI6lNaUqU0AhnoG3yIOK8lY4kFu3QmNw4h1r+OCctASMJe8dUOTnF53TjJzYQk=3D > =3DTguL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > I'd be more active and vocal in trying to help sort this out, but it's been a busy week since the 1k mile trip to get a car and working on getting it into the shape I want it in... that aside, I *did* manage to, without any changes, drop in the config provided at the start of all this into a gentoo-sources 3.2.12 tree (after a quick mrproper) and it built without issues. To me, that indicates that the toolchain, particular copy of the sources, or hardware have an issue. That the problem is as consistent as it is while the rest of the system isn't failing in horrifying ways implies it's not the hardware. The resulting modules and kernel from my building it can be grabbed from http://poisonbl.freeshell.org/3.2.12_test.tar.bz2 --=20 Poison [BLX] Joshua M. Murphy