From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-157509-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DBC1391DB
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 01:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9785EE0984;
	Wed, 30 Jul 2014 01:01:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E58AE0941
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 01:01:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hn18so1972299igb.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=XLRU9Atmen8nDDAMq9pAJ6Scz/wseUlxsagSc3H/4dY=;
        b=sHUA++VVEzhd25VTBkm0PqKLqWlp73ivM6VZdm5rlG4SzTAIcoMQFY+1IlTBe2IOxa
         0VFVbZFdGhpRxqzTuWmU/2KLK+dnvQRrE/zBBG0S7lX+/3usbsh4mjGIe4T6TtjujKKA
         gpJvKVKrkLzb4F5FtzZkf5c7KeolJJtqrVqvLk3dxW5a6YlVgRFJEaWVHcV4djexaMmg
         KNoToqJp0bWSnryykFfZ2uL0e1IV6uL8FDnUiSb0jgl8Cvv2dp4DbAhHRBnhypLq+4wK
         Hcr2EDbl1wz3Ttz6akudTampgrlkKUzag898HGBLMs84v3WZ300rTtX4C+oMw0g3efij
         jfgw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.62.6 with SMTP id w6mr968872ich.24.1406682094905; Tue, 29
 Jul 2014 18:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.14.204 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53D81398.6090301@gmail.com>
References: <CAO5-k+rEqJHSA2DOBNMt+jDXpPBJmrQ9OY0eT2xhLhgWZRxxFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140729201652.GA14289@waltdnes.org>
	<53D81398.6090301@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 05:31:34 +0430
Message-ID: <CAO5-k+pPyyRGQKmd3o2f9hLUngXvXJEFT9KoQsnB-YYrUt1WUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] USE flags handling
From: behrouz khosravi <bz.khosravi@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 429f9b28-299d-4ebf-ae5a-81b272516579
X-Archives-Hash: 688eacd46cb996aea2c432c2c3a51d94

Thank you all.

I have concluded that I should stay with the base profile. Although I
need a desktop, but this decision will be closest to what I want in a
harmless way! (at least less harm!)
Then I will add CPU specific and very frequent flags to make.conf and
gradually extend the package.use file.