From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-152693-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C29138247
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:03:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB571E09C0;
	Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:03:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f194.google.com (mail-ob0-f194.google.com [209.85.214.194])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D6EE0998
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f194.google.com with SMTP id wo20so2299650obc.9
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:03:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=4upPyGMysQuOGvi0AwK9KC/nN3WolBu9wz38lK3qXE8=;
        b=F/n+enm44Wg0vInwJRDsToYdRxUVPbc8ZAvVUHGZi2K49UCyvcKj2CPe5J6TN5BOx5
         BcMrFdUBRtu3HRxUGbx+azxKxYWd29y6J7pgdwV8OJvmLY20ZIHaspM1CIFQ8wwmbKG/
         g13NMKAJ5S97DDRQwof4dnwQDeBFiNJcrFKTKwps4gWsqXyVfLPqZbRJPu/46s0CM3j+
         H6OyWlrE/hgFqAYqKCANTEeW9JcWIWJOWLJ/uzvCkV3/ukpv58DO0Ych4dEUwQvAkOOl
         N4lPHee0Fc8H2/wBTJWuH2idpk0c+n9Ed18yBYPv+cHexNCAielmOCrkSJQtjV8nhivc
         SXGw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.123.75 with SMTP id ly11mr28189084oeb.26.1388045007913;
 Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.47.16 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:03:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANpc5t=GokX-4LjR2X1BEc-6mhTDOdszF61XxN3u14rPFq1u1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANpc5t=8TNBfifUKYHP2Nng0RQQZhq+jVDYVurRUuWRVy9KJ0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANpc5t=GokX-4LjR2X1BEc-6mhTDOdszF61XxN3u14rPFq1u1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 17:03:27 +0900
Message-ID: <CANpc5t=m_xGQ7JO89PCVnTMrRTfRoGADHjuObHPVNx9y=itwaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: ebuild for "gcc-independent llvm and clang for linux"
From: Takayuki Yamaguchi <tyamaguchi.gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 195ff3a0-c700-41e7-845f-e3a81e2170bb
X-Archives-Hash: a103281deb53f66c45ccfd3c4f22d40d

Sorry for earlier mis-send.

I send the article again.
------------
I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my "Linux" PC as
1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled by clang.
2. The binaries of 1. depend on libc++.so instead of libstdc++.so.
3. libc++.so was installed by portage.
4. The binaries of llvm, clang, and libc++.so are not linked with libgcc.
   If linkage with libraries like libgcc is necessary, compiler_rt is linked.

Checking the ebuilds of llvm, I found

sys-libs/libcxx
in DEPEND. But from the comment of revision, append libcxx in
dependency is for freebsd.

I want to ask

I. Building packages described above can be created using ebuilds in
main repository in linux?
II. if I. is not possible, any ebuild of llvm and clang exists anywhere?

If ebuilds that fill II. are not exist, I will to try create such ebuilds.