From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-160170-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61361389E2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B16C8E097E;
	Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:21:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7567FE0955
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:21:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id l18so1630955wgh.12
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:21:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=e2ukA+H7vQjs652cScZouQVOmsTKbQrOgPvoGkUA2hw=;
        b=rbnjdY9dgs6HIvC6FISV6oaHD4pj+vhwAZGoK2ode/9Z7Yk8KpZgqDE4Ymq+VghpQi
         I00ZOWqIBok6AdLNjqE7CAc/bcTud5lD5qU4NDTKKzDDi98aJ32CU3AcaH9BXruTqftM
         ra2yLEZamkYjnPL+aYiWb4jKci+zVnMJ9MQXSwT1oRD+HWo/y3/HbWCqnNcDsDXSB46e
         hFdZiRjuxFJH1DfW5ctbC/mVZPJXRlFy2WXr+Q652R2JY2qTbGFVYVXddsvp4KR/lNJ8
         6UpVjRNZZKCTSctPA74c2RwnsFhHZ7X8WkHZpIe5TBZ9chcuXRf/31zpXyzwz6n6szVn
         32yA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.75.116 with SMTP id b20mr33263191wiw.49.1416939666212;
 Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.182.130 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:21:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54740bae.c12a980a.75de.01e4@mx.google.com>
References: <546EE70C.2050506@yourstruly.sx>
	<CADPrc81rgkcd_AMdFFk6WgH+tirzXnpxr8N8RstjcspCyipftg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_=TNQOBq0yMNOMxaQeuCGH-eAGNb9yB8L2FWjjYjOZJpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141121173600.GA1029@ca.inter.net>
	<547370D2.50009@marc-stuermer.de>
	<54737886.a3a7700a.6f81.4209@mx.google.com>
	<20141124210516.53a54a90@digimed.co.uk>
	<54740bae.c12a980a.75de.01e4@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:21:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN_TFxMHPu_1k5x29XA8Np8V1OP9B19a5gyW3O8N3iz6bAywgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now
From: Maxim Wexler <maxim.wexler@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: bc89b8f8-6627-4103-ba63-1c377d885777
X-Archives-Hash: 3ea6125204ef5d18600d1d6e0b2cccfe

>
> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
> *forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
> frame button and have argued that it is more ergonomic.
>
> There was not any possibility to change the place of the closing
> window frame button in Unity via configuration options. Quite a
> lot of Ubuntu users complained about it yet in Ubuntu 10.04,
> where the new place of that button was a new default though
> it was possible to change it back via configuration options.
> In Unity, it was absolutely impossible.


Try Lubuntu, with LXDE.