From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-132282-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RZ58f-0005PK-Dm
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:25:41 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C536521C0B7;
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 18:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF8021C087
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 18:24:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eaal13 with SMTP id l13so1880713eaa.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:24:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=zu70SvXAibEvB29CzKRmg0m4Ng2Vdwl+V4S8Q27c6QE=;
b=SDFlwdGAg81ahHn1USg4LQei5WsueAXLiQusi9X/iTfWX/c6VS0cdBsvkcgdW2P1Id
tFQACqxVljjguJnv5/pF2YVznNrmG4D6dB9ZOZAHEzEmObEx9a8eE3bAkPQCMfpBE+dk
fVjC1346gOyq78wAmeiqzNd08hW3ljge/jvdk=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.10.11 with SMTP id n11mr278877ebn.81.1323455048601; Fri,
09 Dec 2011 10:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.33.133 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:24:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2383832.qsbc0XXNJT@eve>
References: <CAN0CFw0r9Gtg9ACVBKV8tW8pmtiwvdfmkRno7xQ-djh4AKNXOg@mail.gmail.com>
<4EE17733.6070601@orlitzky.com>
<CAN0CFw39fDRC-EYxP16yv3bQw-ePSCTiWvsVbL9LWeRbuLM_ng@mail.gmail.com>
<2383832.qsbc0XXNJT@eve>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:24:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw3hyfzQFvR+xBtNmFW8qf6SEAXUfFojn+2-0LJY2vo4vA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo location for squirrelmail attachments
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 8d69a760-f500-4fbc-8891-0b053b5247b7
X-Archives-Hash: becb9aef78fb41735db33eac784eb5bd
>> There is a Squirrelmail document recommending that the Squirrelmail
>> data and attachments directories are established outside of the web
>> server's reach. =A0/var is given as an example. =A0They also recommend
>> root:apache 0730 for both directories.
>>
>> This is a little disturbing because my Squirrelmail data directory was
>> created under the webroot as apache:apache 0755 at some point. =A0Would
>> this have been done by Gentoo? =A0Should I file a bug?
>>
>> "Prepare data and attachment directories"
>> http://squirrelmail.org/docs/admin/admin-3.html
>>
>> - Grant
>
> I think the data-directory is included from upstream and is there to have=
it
> work when installing it "blindly". Recommendations are not always possibl=
e
> (think hosted environments)
The Squirrelmail list is telling me:
> SquirrelMail doesn't create any directories aside from the ones
> contained in the installation itself. It doesn't put anything in your
> webroot or anywhere else unless you're using some third party
> installer that does other things.
>
> Maybe you should file a bug report against whatever entity it was that
> provided the package that did that.
Does this sound like a Gentoo bug I should report?
- Grant