From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960211381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E94A421C0D7; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F098321C0BE for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c50so2647123eek.40 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:46:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RUXNdDX9ALTvgkH1IE4jJR1pOE3YO6dWFWnmJFLaTqQ=; b=VknnpNSZ4Csd6ffAln9qKhuR2i+sG5G6zAlLely1edhofkVZlrafnqc0QvoWHm54H6 T4YMFih+RJHuXOx/kMiv6slh6294HosKiWpljwCOUJ155m9zJ6Ptim/S06Yr5jzjVPmH fmQ/v89POdfk37Tj21gnBlAZNl6YtjqfbdLgFCfB19laeY3mMCcsoAQ4Jacqb3AzGcjd AXiLaIW+E93WGiG6VmNRpyW5HpbWaMUpMinKwAGF/ejS7SCGAbp3EMeRzXv/VYzkixzf qH31W70rsyXXw3CUnAZXLBBxLsaauLEqudy1RxNOLp8+OiFrwP/+qmYNp6eeOKmjHJtC 0lWQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.194.199 with SMTP id m47mr26011047een.11.1355600796489; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.158.68 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:46:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1832535.yE7Zi1bxev@localhost> References: <4306054.0dMEylK9kK@localhost> <1832535.yE7Zi1bxev@localhost> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:46:36 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Dual or Quad CPU complications? From: Grant To: Gentoo mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343a8aee967304d0e96732 X-Archives-Salt: 4b7019b1-0864-4ee9-929b-c137dbeaa3ec X-Archives-Hash: e1c1cc831c6b5b80fdacf0dfc260b401 --047d7b343a8aee967304d0e96732 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > You have to buy NUMA hardware. If the hardware you buys does not scream NUMA > at you, you don't have it. It is really that simple. > > Multicore, multisocket systems MIGHT be NUMA systems - but that is not a > guarantee. Now can this stupid thread please die away? I guess the question seems stupid if you already know the answer. - Grant --047d7b343a8aee967304d0e96732 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > You have to buy NUMA hardware. If the hardware you buys does not scream NUMA
> at you, you don't have it. It is really that simple.
>
> Multicore, multisocket systems MIGHT be NUMA systems - but that is not a
> guarantee. Now can this stupid thread please die away?

I guess the question seems stupid if you already know the answer.

- Grant
--047d7b343a8aee967304d0e96732--