From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596731381FB for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 00:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60267E06B1; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 00:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C29E0687 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 00:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c50so617096eek.40 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:55:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eOkz7fcjp98hZjgCtRVMjpUtsclU1iQX1bY57E7ivA8=; b=CyDF2TFrQBE1Ve8tZqDYz2xzhOEk9kyeEuuVIxJHA7qd5Ejk9/QmBcUNY3Tlxs+pjF rTSuLMlENG7BvsHQHHLkYgsB7nNcnQuyGxpAovmIKW0WwtFKZ9qC3yv+sGG14AXiaf0F EjMNjLYdv7olwNT2My7UFJLPlBRR/PHADKoFpFQ7+K6y1dIz1YheLd5OW775Y84cvdRZ DA5CA2p45a9rD7mPpajF+76IiT69oY0GICrTHxKHSTIUTXW+33mnPjSZAeYVfFAo6pzt xYnEG+EDrigtbGaUsJ7WhqA0nPUpQWsOlBIho06xF47Tazkbqml1sbGgsQ+17ur70Vtn xbsg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.194.195 with SMTP id m43mr22714362een.44.1354928107171; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.158.68 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:55:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121205125012.29ea6228@digimed.co.uk> References: <5c00f8dd-b7d0-40c7-90cd-cbff12abfd85@email.android.com> <20121205125012.29ea6228@digimed.co.uk> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:55:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] System maintenance procedure? From: Grant To: Gentoo mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b342c4c862fce04d04cc868 X-Archives-Salt: 51224227-f104-40bd-945b-03ba5add696a X-Archives-Hash: e6a8656d9659954ee9baccc33cb773e4 --047d7b342c4c862fce04d04cc868 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > The first depclean is redundant, you haven't updated anything so it > > > won't > >> show anything useful. I only run depclean and revdep-rebuild weekly,I > >> don't see a need to routinely do it more often, especially on slower > >> systems. I do run eix-update and eix-update-remote after my daily > >> sync.I run eix-test-obsolete from the weekly cron script. > >> > > I should have said that I'm emailed the results of the first set of > > commands so the first depclean is there to let me know what would be > > removed after yesterday's update. > > But you ran depclean manually after yesterday's update, so it should show > nothing. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick You're right, I'm not sure what I was thinking. - Grant --047d7b342c4c862fce04d04cc868 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > The first depclean is redundant, you haven't updated any= thing so it
> > > won't
> >> show anything usef= ul. I only run depclean and revdep-rebuild weekly,I
> >> don= 9;t see a need to routinely do it more often, especially on slower
> >> systems. I do run eix-update and eix-update-remote after my d= aily
> >> sync.I run eix-test-obsolete from the weekly cron scr= ipt.
> >>
> > I should have said that I'm emailed = the results of the first set of
> > commands so the first depclean is there to let me know what would= be
> > removed after yesterday's update.
>
> But = you ran depclean manually after yesterday's update, so it should show > nothing.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick

= You're right, I'm not sure what I was thinking.

- Grant
--047d7b342c4c862fce04d04cc868--