From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RXxxn-0001jh-25 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:33:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45AD221C1D0; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B34221C1C8 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaal13 with SMTP id l13so1828730eaa.40 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:32:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s8jzITwULOTD0H74utscJICuNk22nJwg2HraSJGSt5k=; b=chrPKlJNriFqMvrEbeqBRyFjHG+pGjxUxqFlDl3zxD2NTpuijlT3nqitpOSC//FyH/ IZ+OOibpFX9RG4deJjWX67oo19pQ9/uuZ0fN+zx5MWntOYtB8b8Wy7E1BxxISjl8970t 3s24jeK3X8KIfvpBhqk229oPdHPXsvLub8guM= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.28.193 with SMTP id n1mr2316281ebc.5.1323189134805; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:32:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.133 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:32:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EDD9D88.7080407@orlitzky.com> References: <4EDAA89F.3090308@orlitzky.com> <4EDAD845.4010402@orlitzky.com> <4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com> <4EDD9D88.7080407@orlitzky.com> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:32:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] clamav and spamassassin From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d0ec514c-3fd4-424e-aebd-f262725bf67d X-Archives-Hash: f49b62becfc50b805496040054dcfef1 >> What about trouble with the DNSBL lists? =A0I know when I changed my IP >> address I had to work to get the new one removed from a few blacklists >> it had previously been placed on. =A0I wasn't sending spam, but my >> messages would have been blocked under that config if I hadn't done >> the work to get the IP off the lists. >> >> - Grant >> > > We do get false positives from the blacklists on rare occasion, but they'= re > the same ones we got before postscreen. > > Before postscreen, we had, > > =A0smtpd_recipient_restrictions =3D > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0permit_mynetworks, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0... > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0reject_rbl_client psbl.surriel.com, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0permit > > After postscreen, we have, > > =A0smtpd_recipient_restrictions =3D > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0permit_mynetworks, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0... > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0permit > > > =A0postscreen_dnsbl_sites =3D > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0psbl.surriel.com, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0bl.spamcop.net, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0zen.spamhaus.org, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0b.barracudacentral.org > > The two should be more or less equivalent considering that > postscreen_dnsbl_threshold =3D 1. (I should mention that you have to regi= ster > with barracuda before using their list.) Got it. Your explanations are positively lucid. I added this to /etc/postifx/main.cf: postscreen_greet_action =3D enforce postscreen_pipelining_enable =3D yes postscreen_pipelining_action =3D enforce postscreen_non_smtp_command_enable =3D yes postscreen_non_smtp_command_action =3D enforce postscreen_bare_newline_enable =3D yes postscreen_bare_newline_action =3D enforce and I commented this and restarted postfix: #check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10030 Should this effectively disable postgrey and enable postscreen? - Grant