From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-145401-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BF8138A91
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:56:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6584421C006;
	Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:55:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC4AFE0509
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:55:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id d7so3682757wer.36
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:55:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=oPsoGCUf6tkY5jU6ec0GI35yxJCt5RPTplp7BpKGmzg=;
        b=vkrtH5qLDvWdVvPtLt05hB7R0TgXsE6DT0ogLcBU5F8hsbDCIEBCzkOdnerfWQQwCp
         Uqlcfryl05aaLkGv/mRMfPf/zcqjrRfYsaRdTocJxi0bR89iRYU2c27ggJHZaxw0yN5l
         BJoik65Av4MpnWO0o47XZavVbLU5Yq3vzweK/ZhfWo+ipE1UzAZEcpA+ZGLms3JIbjK0
         6tnDcRi82LqUI0c3TbGRPACvbbee9TWh/lq7wceHiCFK6jA4wvoJtPUF1GialIro7OT/
         9A77ivwbAGAXVgmikuZmLVd3gcYRzEN06piLZVt7WziIo3Hl0QAEDj2UN5G8Fsp9TOWk
         H7Yw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.242.69 with SMTP id wo5mr10896774wjc.10.1361044541170;
 Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:55:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.242.103 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:55:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51194D41.8010508@gmail.com>
References: <CAN0CFw0Zcn5BtzHbOVELrN+ihJ1B93+=Cr+YAfkSXJrSsuD__g@mail.gmail.com>
	<5113DA25.7060408@gmail.com>
	<CAN0CFw1bfy8huhECBFyn3H_XpOfJGPZ-BjPpXo5mGLaC_5ihHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+czFiCe1u=b9m+bt95Bdo9WAi6EULqBG1GqCRsZs62nWVon4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN0CFw3hx7huykjkkujppjBcY=ZMhnYg=Sd1iM=gvvX3BxmoYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5115BB67.9010307@gmail.com>
	<CAN0CFw25qnTpJ+6ZHMCErT1wdAU4GeNnaXg+=UwoZPj9MxWGcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<51192DC5.6040802@gmail.com>
	<51194D41.8010508@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:55:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw3A2Ym7Re8SABZx8vVuvVpET8HOi17V5_jdGSXxka7qrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} LWP::UserAgent slows website
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: c12bebc7-c9df-489e-be0b-23ff020155dc
X-Archives-Hash: 71703c2ce0b3dbc7a6fd592ac0d51238

>> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your server
>> runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its request?
>>
>> To me, that indicates that important data wound up getting swapped to
>> disk on the server, and the slow behavior reported by other users is
>> the result of that data being swapped back in on-demand.
>>
>> That also indicates that your script's requests (and, possibly,
>> request pattern) cause some process in the server to allocate far more
>> memory than usual, which is why the server is swapping things to disk.

OK, thank you for the explanation.  That does make sense.

> I agree. My rule of thumb was always that I must prevent Apache swapping
> at all costs as the performance impact is horrific.
>
> It doesn't have to mean installing more RAM (which is quick, easy, cheap
> and often rather effective), sensible optimizations can work wonders
> too, as can nginx as a proxy in front of Apache.

I've been using net-mail/up-imapproxy but the initscript has issues.
Is nginx good for IMAP too?

- Grant