From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} USB 3.0 hard drive speed test
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:04:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw2kvs3Dja7Ggw4c1Lh22mxrKoDMF9S9nDEY=eVTt++tmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEH5T2MSgaf2P3A3f6bAtVpE7ONp_HcvrPugCdB7C0HUkTo-UQ@mail.gmail.com>
>> USB 3.0 throughput is said to be 625 MB/s so I must be running up
>> against the speed of the disk itself in USB 3.0 mode, correct?
>
> Processing power of the external USB<->SATA controller chip could also
> come into play. But in your case I think you're getting the maximum
> speed possible from the drive. Be happy. :)
I'm happy. I just like to know where I stand relative to the spec.
> Surely a faster/higher-powered disk and I would guess that USB 3 maybe
> has higher latency than the SATA controller on your laptop's
> motherboard. I know USB 2.0 has latency problems (and why the audio
> nerds* prefer firewire equipment).
>
> * used as a term of endearment :)
For audio playback, USB is now just as good as Firewire thanks to the
inception of the asynchronous (as opposed to synchronous or adaptive)
USB DAC. In an asynchronous implementation, the clock is in the DAC
itself and operates independently of the computer. However, if
Firewire has lower latency I can see how it would be better than USB
for audio recoding and production.
- Grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-12 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 17:12 [gentoo-user] {OT} USB 3.0 hard drive speed test Grant
2011-08-11 17:27 ` covici
2011-08-11 17:30 ` Mark Knecht
2011-08-11 18:25 ` Grant
2011-08-18 19:46 ` Grant
2011-08-18 22:46 ` Paul Hartman
2011-08-18 23:32 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-08-20 4:48 ` Paul Hartman
2011-08-12 14:58 ` Michael Mol
2011-08-12 22:03 ` covici
2011-08-11 17:30 ` Mark Knecht
2011-08-11 17:49 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-08-11 17:57 ` Simon
2011-08-11 18:50 ` Grant
2011-08-11 18:59 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-08-11 20:20 ` Paul Hartman
2011-08-12 2:04 ` Grant [this message]
2011-08-12 8:54 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-08-11 18:27 ` Grant
2011-08-11 18:34 ` Mark Knecht
2011-08-11 18:52 ` Grant
2011-08-11 19:04 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-08-11 17:46 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN0CFw2kvs3Dja7Ggw4c1Lh22mxrKoDMF9S9nDEY=eVTt++tmQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox