From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RXlfi-0007vu-7D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:26:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18CE021C15A; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 03:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8888521C054 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 03:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekb57 with SMTP id b57so1126605eek.40 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:24:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fvXSX3MT/38g8bx+80VWkcpQpoyQuvS2RmyabAJAfVo=; b=DZ6stZg2u1/HNwwMTx6nmpLPeDkLswKa6t4a8jHKqNMxYhl0KXfL1Rcz7WdBWOmWbs vfBdlpAmrSN5UntADHMG9zowN2iKVUeymmwo3r+bx57mNxhTN8puJTNOI+oHQ6zy5eSS EIdcUTIUZUphnkoH+Yx5FAHc92NgzISr/89XY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.10.145 with SMTP id p17mr1699708ebp.43.1323141860697; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:24:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.33.133 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:24:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com> References: <4EDAA89F.3090308@orlitzky.com> <4EDAD845.4010402@orlitzky.com> <4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 19:24:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] clamav and spamassassin From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 767606bc-4d60-4297-82bc-dcc52090e2f7 X-Archives-Hash: 607688acbeb8810371415a9b35bffd33 >> =A0> I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me. >> =A0> How long have you been running them? =A0Have you been notified of a= ny >> =A0> mistakenly rejected mail? =A0It's very important my server doesn't = miss >> =A0> any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam. >> =A0> >> >> Similar situation with me. Because my company is in the financial >> sector, false negatives are much more preferred than false positives. >> > > I have never had a false positive report that I traced back to one of the > postscreen deep protocol tests. > > That being said, they've only been in place for ~4 months. What about trouble with the DNSBL lists? I know when I changed my IP address I had to work to get the new one removed from a few blacklists it had previously been placed on. I wasn't sending spam, but my messages would have been blocked under that config if I hadn't done the work to get the IP off the lists. - Grant