From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-135358-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1S0eCG-0000aG-7t
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:19:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED2FEE0D70;
	Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD68E0D70
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:17:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so631985eek.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of emailgrant@gmail.com designates 10.14.29.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.29.6;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of emailgrant@gmail.com designates 10.14.29.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=emailgrant@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=emailgrant@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.29.6])
        by 10.14.29.6 with SMTP id h6mr1510970eea.119.1330024674460 (num_hops = 1);
        Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:17:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=wBZEaDVBIRaiN3s9YcInlecLDtTogNAIwL8l4hDiXNA=;
        b=YTfTHsFnr862DwxAiql9B4kW/89jlhFDhmtFm4iAnolYMVmj8MWHlydwB+IU1T7aFK
         YMh4PHryLqsOPMX68ll56TGbZGS9ykUVYvTpK2XrdiVTWf58/7eM/Q/ojlmPtdOo8EsD
         /NY5NfkvWguALUXeNvJwYhmmmWDPn+U2/e8kE=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.29.6 with SMTP id h6mr1190451eea.119.1330024674338; Thu, 23
 Feb 2012 11:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.113.148 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:17:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw2VdRGB=h6i+feNKQT9nSzQoiT9KWGSpNqVM+GDAv=N7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 3760fa76-cffa-401a-a725-70894e1b24dd
X-Archives-Hash: 59ebf71943be7750f02e45ac797b4525

The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a
segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't
change anything.  Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure?
Should I run memtester?  Any other tests to run?  Nothing in dmesg.

- Grant