From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143492-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949251381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:06:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E6F721C090;
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E87F21C090
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:04:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id je9so24712bkc.13
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:04:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=AHcPY7F1GYaAmOJWK+IJDbpwuNHXnwTzf/Muu9ubhxc=;
b=wKTupkBpbr/ceerEHgQfC7i86opPChe70rAfVDTfT0ZM5YCvN26DxZfHceOFrbi8XJ
roPiMAHqJZLFkNlE7NoCYsKeUTjVKlaAw08dZZt2u1iVOoX9d3yo34XczdxyW6ooBP4C
KTrdpN+M1R5ciBilcPB2ljHuL9zXKskD8+KCVOLVMncuD27yX/R5aIwm/506k57YC8yK
Ph7SBqrIhC5nxRTMUflICRH8VHSn8fbWQmTEari6xB+UrOtLyqbIn/OsFaKiDzmBI5kd
Gg63J6/DDnNOe7cwSg3S06hXrPnli1zhtQD8oMgZTpMxxTXrpYP/41fRzmqZ7sB/bsUU
ogYw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.9.3 with SMTP id j3mr87937bkj.134.1355796286792; Mon, 17
Dec 2012 18:04:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.99.72 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:04:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20121218031156.01923a71@khamul.example.com>
References: <CAN0CFw1WninDPPk4PS85ojoXTP7D1=syDS7gfYYje9vEEUacwQ@mail.gmail.com>
<50CF44B4.2050107@orlitzky.com>
<CAN0CFw3fUnHR65MnkTFRNtPn4APHAQ-6iHnZ8XRH_AF5i5wpog@mail.gmail.com>
<20121218031156.01923a71@khamul.example.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:04:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN0CFw2FP2giQveYWAm+Po7QRkvxq2ngnV10T3s3bafw7gCzaw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} open-source: chat, tasks, resources, code
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151758f2aa0fe5b004d116ecc3
X-Archives-Salt: 4b918d07-420e-4d71-9f07-9633392f515f
X-Archives-Hash: f98c9493c9066c852c91aa6293a47118
--00151758f2aa0fe5b004d116ecc3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > > For chat, run an IRC or XMPP server.
> >
> > Has anyone used an XMPP client for communication/collaboration within
> > a company that they would recommend?
>
> Surely you meant server there, not client?
I thought I meant client. Does server functionality vary as far as what
shows up on the client end? I imagined the client-facing functionality to
be the same amongst the various servers.
> XMPP clients are a dime a dozen, take you pick: pidgin, kopete,
> telepathy and a hots of others.
>
> Servers are another story. All of them that you can lay your hands on
> seem to suck big eggs big time. ejabberd is the only one I found
> stable enough to actually stay up for sane amounts of time, and not
> DEPEND on java.
>
> But that info might be well out of date, I haven't looked at our
> jabber server for ages. There's no need to - the techies all
> gravitated by themselves over to GTalk and Skype, claiming that the
> cloud services did everything they needed and more, and it was there,
> and it worked. Our in-house jabber server - not so much.
>
> Can't say I blame them. It's true.
Thanks Alan, this is just the kind of info I need. It sounds like I would
be better off with a cloud solution for collaborative chat.
- Grant
--00151758f2aa0fe5b004d116ecc3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > > For chat, run an IRC or XMPP server.<br>> ><br>> &g=
t; Has anyone used an XMPP client for communication/collaboration within<br=
>> > a company that they would recommend?<br>><br>> Surely you =
meant server there, not client?<br>
<br>I thought I meant client. =A0Does server functionality vary as far as w=
hat shows up on the client end? =A0I imagined the client-facing functionali=
ty to be the same amongst the various servers.<div><br>> XMPP clients ar=
e a dime a dozen, take you pick: pidgin, kopete,<br>
> telepathy and a hots of others.<br>><br>> Servers are another st=
ory. All of them that you can lay your hands on<br>> seem to suck big eg=
gs big time. ejabberd is the only one I found<br>> stable enough to actu=
ally stay up for sane amounts of time, and not<br>
> DEPEND on java.<br>><br>> But that info might be well out of dat=
e, I haven't looked at our<br>> jabber server for ages. There's =
no need to - the techies all<br>> gravitated by themselves over to GTalk=
and Skype, claiming that the<br>
> cloud services did everything they needed and more, and it was there,<=
br>> and it worked. Our in-house jabber server - not so much.<br>><br=
>> Can't say I blame them. It's true.<br><br><div>Thanks Alan, t=
his is just the kind of info I need. =A0It sounds like I would be better of=
f with a cloud solution for collaborative chat.</div>
<div><br></div><div>- Grant</div></div>
--00151758f2aa0fe5b004d116ecc3--